From: Jeff Koh (jkoh.tt@hotmail.com)
Date: Tue Sep 11 2007 - 03:07:13 ART
thanks guys.
so it will be as follow:
R1 (Loopback 100 : 100.100.100.100), R3 (Loopback0: 3.3.3.3)
ip pim sparse mode
ip pim autorp-listener
ip pim send-rp-announce loopback100 scope 16 group-list 16
ip pim send-rp-discovery loopback0 scope 16
thanks!!
cheers,
> Subject: RE: Multicast - Backup> Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 12:51:31 +0100> From: yemi.salau@siemens.com> To: hadek.el-ayachi@nsn.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com> > I agree with you mate, just responded to Dan's comment ... "Can not be> done using auto-rp, you will need to use BSR."> > Moreover, Jeff said no static-rp, so the only option will be one that> can push out the rp information to pim devices "automatically", Auto-rp> and BSR will usually fit the bill, but if you don't want to fiddle with> IP Address (when there is no higher address on R1 and you're not allowed> to configure a new one, and there is no restriction on using static-rp,> then obviously, you've got your alternative of combining static-rp with> auto-rp)> > Many Thanks> > Yemi Salau> > -----Original Message-----> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of> hadek.el-ayachi@nsn.com> Sent: Monday, September 10, 2007 12:30 PM> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com> Subject: RE: Multicast - Backup> !
> I Think the only way to answer these requirements is to use pim> listener and make the pim source address of R1 bigger than R3 IP pim> source address.> > > -----Original Message-----> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of> ext Salau, Yemi> Sent: lundi 10 septembre 2007 09:20> To: Dan C; Carlos Trujillo Jimenez> Cc: joe@affirmedsystems.com; jkoh.tt@hotmail.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com> Subject: RE: Multicast - Backup> > Hello Dan,> > Why can't Backup Rp be done with auto-rp? Without modifying the IP> Address of both RPs, I don't think BSR is the only way to go, also I> would be surprised if asked to configure BSR in a Cisco environment,> from the way things are going, Cisco is pushing the Auto-rp> implementation into the market more and more.> > Remember when a PIM device receive 2 entries of RP information for same> group, it sticks (prefers) with the one from auto-rp over static-rp> information.> > So in case you have R1 and R2 with loopb!
ack Ips of 1.1.1.1 and 2.2.2.2> respectively, if I want to mak!
e R1 the
RP, I could do with a combination> of static and auto-rp without reconfiguring R1's IP> > I would simply advertise R1 as RP for group X via auto-rp and advertise> R2 as RP for same group X via static-rp .... That way, pim routers will> always prefer R1 over R2 even though R1 has a lower IP address.... So if> the R1 is unreachable, they then switch to R2> > Many Thanks> > Yemi Salau> > -----Original Message-----> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of> Dan C> Sent: Monday, September 10, 2007 7:09 AM> To: Carlos Trujillo Jimenez> Cc: joe@affirmedsystems.com; jkoh.tt@hotmail.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com> Subject: Re: Multicast - Backup> > Hi Carlos,> > Can not be done using auto-rp, you will need to use BSR.> > Cheers,> Dan> > On 9/10/07, Carlos Trujillo Jimenez <nergal888@hotmail.com> wrote:> >> > Joe.> > from the example above, is there a way to manually force the router> > 1.1.1.1> > (lowest ip address) to be the active RP withouth modifyng i!
p> addressing in> > both routers??> >> >> >> > >From: "Joseph Brunner" <joe@affirmedsystems.com>> >> > >X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Sep 2007 05:41:23.0527 (UTC) > > >FILETIME=[38EB2D70:01C7F36D]> > >> > >Easy, Beavis...> > >> > >You didn't say we can't use AUTO RP...> > >> > >Ip pim autorp listener (read up on this command)> > >> > >Auto-rp mapping agent uses highest IP's to decide winner.> > >> > >3.3.3.3 beats 1.1.1.1. when 3.3.3.3 is gone, 1.1.1.1 will be rp.> > >> > >-J> > >> > >-----Original Message-----> > >From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf> Of> > >Jeff> > >Koh> > >Sent: Sunday, September 09, 2007 11:58 PM> > >To: ccielab@groupstudy.com> > >Subject: Multicast - Backup> > >> > >Hi Guys,> > >> > >How do we come up with the following scenario?> > >> > >- Use PIM Sparse mode only.> > >- R3 (loopback: 3.3.3.3) backup of R1 (loopback:1.1.1.1)> > >- No static RP.> > >- No BSR.> > >> > >How do we set up a redundant RP base on the above require!
ment?> > >> > >thanks!> > >> > >cheers,> > >__________________!
________
_______________________________________> > >Get the new Windows Live Hotmail!> > >http://www.discoverhotmail.com/Hotmail/Default.aspx?Locale=en-SG#2> > >> >> >_______________________________________________________________________> > >Subscription information may be found at:> > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html> > >> >> >_______________________________________________________________________> > >Subscription information may be found at:> > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html> >> > _________________________________________________________________> > Charla con tus amigos en lmnea mediante MSN Messenger:> > http://messenger.latam.msn.com/> >> >> _______________________________________________________________________> > Subscription information may be found at:> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html> > _______________________________________________________________________> Subscription information may be found at: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/C!
CIELab.html> > _______________________________________________________________________> Subscription information may be found at: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html> > _______________________________________________________________________> Subscription information may be found at: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html> > _______________________________________________________________________> Subscription information may be found at: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Oct 06 2007 - 12:01:10 ART