From: Alex Steer (alex.steer@eison.co.uk)
Date: Mon Sep 10 2007 - 18:26:44 ART
Thanks Joe
Great help
-----Original Message-----
From: Joseph Brunner [mailto:joe@affirmedsystems.com]
Sent: 10 September 2007 22:22
To: Alex Steer; 'Cisco certification'
Subject: RE: ebgp loadbalancing
Its showing you the *best* bgp route which will be propagated to peers;
Remember although we can load balance in the routing table with bgp
learned
routes only one best route gets advertised to neighbors...
Now do show ip route 10.1.127.7
You should see something like
B 10.1.127.0/x via 1.1.123.1
1.1.123.2
-Joe
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Alex
Steer
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2007 5:00 PM
To: Cisco certification
Subject: ebgp loadbalancing
Hi everyone
Forgive the lack on config but see the output from a single router
below:-
s> 10.1.127.0/24 1.1.123.1 0 0 29
?
s 1.1.123.2 0
0 29 ?
show ip route 10.1.127.0
Routing entry for 10.1.127.0/24
Known via "bgp 10", distance 20, metric 0
Tag 29, type external
Last update from 1.1.123.2 00:03:57 ago
Routing Descriptor Blocks:
* 1.1.123.1, from 1.1.123.1, 00:04:31 ago
Route metric is 0, traffic share count is 1
AS Hops 1
1.1.123.2, from 1.1.123.2, 00:03:57 ago
Route metric is 0, traffic share count is 1
AS Hops 1
traceroute 10.1.127.7
Type escape sequence to abort.
Tracing the route to 10.1.127.7
1 1.1.123.2 16 msec
1.1.123.1 16 msec
1.1.123.2 16 msec
2 10.1.127.7 [AS 29] 16 msec * 16 msec
Does anybody know why bgp suggests it's not using both paths for this
route? Looks like it to me
Thank you
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Oct 06 2007 - 12:01:10 ART