RE: Multicast - Backup

From: Joseph Brunner (joe@affirmedsystems.com)
Date: Mon Sep 10 2007 - 02:38:37 ART

• Next message: srinivas pv: "Re: Need suggestion about travelling to Brussels"
• Previous message: Carlos Trujillo Jimenez: "FW: RE: CONFLICT BETWEEN OSPF OVER NBMA AND TRAFFIC SHAPING"
• Maybe in reply to: Jeff Koh: "Multicast - Backup"
• Next in thread: Carlos Trujillo Jimenez: "RE: Multicast - Backup"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Easy, Beavis...

You didn't say we can't use AUTO RP...

Ip pim autorp listener (read up on this command)

Auto-rp mapping agent uses highest IP's to decide winner.

3.3.3.3 beats 1.1.1.1. when 3.3.3.3 is gone, 1.1.1.1 will be rp.

-J

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Jeff
Koh
Sent: Sunday, September 09, 2007 11:58 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Multicast - Backup

Hi Guys,
 
How do we come up with the following scenario?
 
- Use PIM Sparse mode only.
- R3 (loopback: 3.3.3.3) backup of R1 (loopback:1.1.1.1)
- No static RP.
- No BSR.
 
How do we set up a redundant RP base on the above requirement?
 
thanks!
 
cheers,

• Next message: srinivas pv: "Re: Need suggestion about travelling to Brussels"
• Previous message: Carlos Trujillo Jimenez: "FW: RE: CONFLICT BETWEEN OSPF OVER NBMA AND TRAFFIC SHAPING"
• Maybe in reply to: Jeff Koh: "Multicast - Backup"
• Next in thread: Carlos Trujillo Jimenez: "RE: Multicast - Backup"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Oct 06 2007 - 12:01:10 ART