Re: is IGP tag transitive

From: Julio Carrasco (julio.carrasco@ya.com)
Date: Fri Sep 07 2007 - 14:36:10 ART


Hi Bit,

RIP do not support tags.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Bit Gossip" <bit.gossip@chello.nl>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2007 6:39 PM
Subject: is IGP tag transitive

> Experts,
> I was under the impression that if routing protocol A set a tag value on a
> certain prefix, when this prefix is redistributed into protocol B the tag
> value is preserved.
> My lab is showing instead that this is not true at least from OSPF to RIP.
> What is the real truth here?
> Thanks,
> bit.
>
> Routing entry for 204.12.3.0/24
> Known via "ospf 1", distance 110, metric 20
> Tag 125, type extern 2, forward metric 128
> Redistributing via rip
> Advertised by rip metric 1 route-map OR
> Last update from 145.3.23.2 on Serial4/0.23, 00:08:00 ago
> Routing Descriptor Blocks:
> * 145.3.23.2, from 150.3.5.5, 00:08:00 ago, via Serial4/0.23
> Route metric is 20, traffic share count is 1
> Route tag 125 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
>
>
> *Sep 7 16:44:46.833: RIP: sending v2 update to 224.0.0.9 via
> FastEthernet1/0
> (145.3.36.3)
> *Sep 7 16:44:46.833: RIP: build update entries
> <....>
>
> *Sep 7 16:44:46.837: 204.12.3.0/24 via 0.0.0.0, metric 1, tag 0
> <<<<<<<<<
>
> Rack3R3#
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Oct 06 2007 - 12:01:10 ART