From: Scott Morris (smorris@ipexpert.com)
Date: Fri Aug 31 2007 - 20:10:24 ART
Actually, section 16.4 (16.4.1 as well) describes the process quite well
about External LSA Path selection...
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2328.html
Every once and a while, it's good to look at the rules. When in doubt, they
win. :)
Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, JNCIE
#153, CISSP, et al.
CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-J
VP - Technical Training - IPexpert, Inc.
IPexpert Sr. Technical Instructor
A Cisco Learning Partner - We Accept Learning Credits!
smorris@ipexpert.com
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Fax: +1.810.454.0130
http://www.ipexpert.com
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Gary
Duncanson
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2007 3:58 PM
To: Scott Smith
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com; Sadiq Yakasai; ISolveSystems; Herbert Maosa;
Joseph Brunner
Subject: Re: OSPF external type-2 route load balance
Thanks for that Scott.
Looks like this demonstrates this rather well, at least how I read it.
From OSPF Design Guide on CCO.
sic 'External routes fall under two categories, external type 1 and external
type 2. The difference between the two is in the way the cost (metric) of
the route is being calculated. The cost of a type 2 route is always the
external cost, irrespective of the interior cost to reach that route.'
Rgds
Gary
----- Original Message -----
From: "Scott Smith" <hioctane@gmail.com>
To: "Sadiq Yakasai" <sadiqtanko@gmail.com>
Cc: "Joseph Brunner" <joe@affirmedsystems.com>; "Herbert Maosa"
<asawilunda@googlemail.com>; "ISolveSystems" <support@isolvesystems.com>;
"Cisco certification" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2007 7:49 PM
Subject: Re: OSPF external type-2 route load balance
> Bingo!
>
> A1 learns 100.100.100.0 from both 10.43.1.61 & 10.43.1.73.
>
> Before - BW 1536 to both ASBRs
>
> A1(config-router)#do sh ip route ospf
> 100.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
> O E2 100.100.100.0 [110/20] via 10.43.1.61, 00:00:36, Serial1/0.1
> [110/20] via 10.43.1.73, 00:00:36,
> Serial1/0.2
>
>
> After - Dropped BW to 512 on s1/0.1
>
> A1(config-subif)#do sh ip route ospf
> 100.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
> O E2 100.100.100.0 [110/20] via 10.43.1.73, 00:00:06, Serial1/0.2
>
>
> Then changed BW back to 1536 on s1/0.1 (now both are equal again)
>
> A1(config-subif)#do sh ip route ospf
> 100.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
> O E2 100.100.100.0 [110/20] via 10.43.1.73, 00:00:02, Serial1/0.2
> [110/20] via 10.43.1.61, 00:00:02,
> Serial1/0.1
>
> The metric is a constant 20, however, for the externals OSPF also uses
> the cost to the ASBR.
>
> --
> Scott
> CCIE #17040 (R&S)
>
>
> On 8/31/07, Sadiq Yakasai <sadiqtanko@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Can you show the Type 4 LSA database as well?
>>
>> I think the cost to the ASBR has a role to play in selecting 2 Type 5
>> LSA's reporting the same prefix.
>>
>> I am not quite sure about this though.
>>
>> _____________________________________________________________________
>> __ Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> _ Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 01 2007 - 11:32:14 ART