From: Scott Morris (smorris@ipexpert.com)
Date: Sun Aug 26 2007 - 21:44:17 ART
An application in that respect suggests that the policy is being applied
perhaps to a subinterface (or single PVC in frame-relay) where a queue does
not exist to be used for queuing.
Now, this is just a silly guess since we don't have much more detailed
information or topology to go with, but that's the first thing that leaps to
my mind!
Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, JNCIE
#153, CISSP, et al.
CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-J
VP - Technical Training - IPexpert, Inc.
IPexpert Sr. Technical Instructor
A Cisco Learning Partner - We Accept Learning Credits!
smorris@ipexpert.com
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Fax: +1.810.454.0130
http://www.ipexpert.com
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
ISolveSystems
Sent: Sunday, August 26, 2007 7:35 PM
To: Cisco certification
Subject: Legacy QoS Conversion:- Custom Queuing to MQC
Hello group,
The question asks to convert Custom Queuing to MQC. I am wondering why is
the need of nested policy-map. Parent Policy-map has a shape average
percent 100. Child policy-map has different classes with bandwidth
classification.
Cheers.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 01 2007 - 11:32:13 ART