Re: Stateful Nat

From: Duncan Maccubbin (duncan.maccubbin@earthlink.net)
Date: Fri Aug 24 2007 - 17:43:22 ART

• Next message: Joseph Brunner: "RE: Expected to know Security Attacks for R+S?"
• Previous message: Ronnie Angello: "Re: Eigrp distance command not changing the distance"
• Maybe in reply to: Joseph Brunner: "Stateful Nat"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

I did it in one of NMC's checkits while I was there for the NMC-2 class and yes it works.

-----Original Message-----
>From: Joseph Brunner <joe@affirmedsystems.com>
>Sent: Aug 24, 2007 3:50 PM
>To: 'Cisco certification' <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Subject: Stateful Nat
>
>Good afternoon,
>
>
>
>I have labbed this up repeatedly has anyone else gotten this to work? Or is
>this just another one of Cisco's "see the commands are there we can do it,
>but it will work in 3 more code revisions features".
>
>
>
>I have tried by manual stateful nat and via the hsrp control "API"
>
>
>
>-Joe
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

• Next message: Joseph Brunner: "RE: Expected to know Security Attacks for R+S?"
• Previous message: Ronnie Angello: "Re: Eigrp distance command not changing the distance"
• Maybe in reply to: Joseph Brunner: "Stateful Nat"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 01 2007 - 11:32:13 ART