From: Pat More (more2go@hotmail.com)
Date: Wed Aug 22 2007 - 23:48:24 ART
Yeah, this is could be one of the unclear rule in the exam. When certain interface is not specifically mentioned for IGP, would you guys use one of the following to inject the subnet into the routing table to achieve full reachability.
1) use 'network' command within the IGP together with passive interface
2) redistribute connected
3) or do nothing
Which method should I use?
What is the full reachability means? My understanding is it should include the subnet connecting to BB as well. Comments are welcome.
If the BB subnet is not in the igp, this will affect the nexthop of the bgp table. What is the rule of this game?
Assuming you are not going to as proctor, any conclusion?
regards
"Herbert Maosa" <asawilunda@googlemail.com> Sent by: nobody@groupstudy.com
To ccielab@groupstudy.com
Gentlemen,
If there are no specific instructions or restrictions regardingredistributing the subnets to the BB routers, are we at liberty to eitheradvertise these in BGP or redistribute into whatever IGP is running on theedge routers ? I must say have now seen a number of work book scenarioswhere nothing is mentioned and I keep on working on the assumption thatlater tasks will take care of the reachability of this subnet into my IGPdomain, only to realise that nothing was specifically tasked out, and yetfull reachability is expected at the end of the Lab.
Can someone advise here ?
Herbert.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 01 2007 - 11:32:12 ART