RE: Virtual CCIE's? - 3550/3560

From: Scott Vermillion (scott_ccie_list@it-ag.com)
Date: Tue Aug 21 2007 - 13:28:06 ART


The good news is that they appear to offer an "academic" license for
individual use (approval time ~1 week). The bad news is that when I
google "virtutech cisco switch," I come up with precious little. Here is
a link to a presentation where Cisco is mentioned in passing:

http://www.deserec.eu/files/first_workshop/pdf/DESEREC_IABG_Simics_Workshop_2006.pdf

It may indeed be possible to emulate a Cisco switch, but it appears as if
there exists no "Dynagen equivalent" for we mere mortals. And no real
history to indicate CPU/memory requirements (could you emulate one switch
with a given hardware configuration or could you emulate 12?). Certainly
there doesn't appear to be any "body of knowledge" out there. Also, not
sure how to take it, but that presentation makes mention of only being
able to bridge "TCP and UDP" from the simulated environment to a physical
NIC (so no control plane traffic directly over IP? etc?). Thus, I'll
keep my ear to the ground on this one, but I still plan to spend the next
several months tackling the CCIE R&S lab vs. being one of the first to
figure SIMICS and Cisco switches out...

  -------- Original Message --------
  Subject: RE: Virtual CCIE's? - 3550/3560
  From: "Lamine BOUAFIA" <b_lamine@yahoo.fr>
  Date: Tue, August 21, 2007 6:48 am
  To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>

  Anyone who know mode about http://www.virtutech.com/products/ and how
  to
  simulate Cisco 3550/3560??

  Regards,

  -----Message d'origine-----
  De : nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] De la part
  de
  Brian Dennis
  Envoyi : mardi 21 ao{t 2007 06:42
  @ : Scott Vermillion; Cisco certification
  Objet : [Bulk] RE: Virtual CCIE's?

  When teaching a class at Cisco recently one of the students said that
  the
  3550 or 3560 can be "virtualized" using software from this company:

  http://www.virtutech.com/products/
  https://www.simics.net/

  Personally I never looked into it but someone here may be familiar
  with
  the software and it's capabilities.

  Brian Dennis, CCIE4 #2210 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/SP)
  bdennis@internetworkexpert.com

  Internetwork Expert, Inc.
  http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
  Toll Free: 877-224-8987
  Direct: 775-745-6404 (Outside the US and Canada)

>----- Original Message -----
  Subject: RE: Virtual CCIE's?
  Date: Mon, August 20, 2007 21:30
  From: "Scott Vermillion" <scott_ccie_list@it-ag.com>

> Unfortunately, the more recent posts I've seen from him would
  indicated
> that, due largely to ASICs that cannot easily be
  reverse-engineered, a
> switch equivalent or extension is all but dead as a concept. This
  is why
> I chose to go ahead and purchase some 3560-8PCs and just move on...
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: Virtual CCIE's?
> From: "darth router" <darklordrouter@gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, August 20, 2007 9:18 pm
> To: ISolveSystems <support@isolvesystems.com>
> Cc: "Scott Vermillion" <scott_ccie_list@it-ag.com>, "Cisco
> certification" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>
> That depends on the devs, and if they can continue to support
  future
> platforms, whether it is possible or feasible. No switches yet,
  maybe
> never, but who knows, chris has some posts where he wanted access
  to
> 6500 switches. Might be workin on it :P I hope so. Here is the site
> with the history.
>
> http://www.ipflow.utc.fr/index.php/Cisco_7200_Simulator
>
> On 8/21/07, ISolveSystems <support@isolvesystems.com> wrote:
>
> You said that Dynamips is in its infancy. I am curious to know
> how old is
> Dynamips? How do you see the continuing development of Dynamips
> to support
> future IOS development?
>
> Regards,
>
> On 8/20/07, Scott Vermillion < scott_ccie_list@it-ag.com> wrote:
> >
> > Gregory,
> >
> > Were a person to acquire the CCIE cert w/ nothing more than
> time on
> > Dynamips, that person may indeed face a few embarrassing
> moments
> > early on. So it should be outlawed and shunned by the
> CCIE-seeking
> > community at large? I'd wager that 90% or better using
> Dynamips for
> > CCIE study have sufficient experience w/ real HW to know
> which side
> > the power switch is on.
> &amp; gt;
> > Do you think you'll normally have physical access to all of
> the
> > routers on which you are expected to perform your work? If
> you
> > require that to do your job, are you effective?
> >
> > Recall that this is real IOS -- not some training
> simulator. So the
> > chassis, the power supply, the interface cards, etc. are
> lacking in
> > your CCIE lab, where you are intensely focused on subtle
> protocol
> > interplay. So? Can you even touch the HW during the CCIE
> practical
> > exam?
> >
> > I have posted this as recently as a few hours ago on the
> professional
> > board:
> >
> > "I have now been dealing with Dynamips since (roughly) Dec of
> last
> > year. I generally trust it (yes, bugs now and then and even
> the
> > occasional crash, but can IOS itself claim otherwise?) and
> actually
> > prefer it over real hardware for a couple of reasons:
> >
> > 1. Recabling a HW lab takes longer than launching a new .net
> file. I
> > keep every .net file I've ever created, along with all of the
> router
> > NVRAM files, etc. Modifying one lab for another purpose gets
> easier
> > and easier as your collection grows. Take good notes on why
> you
> > created a given environment and your results. This becomes a
> highly
> > valuable reference resource when you've grown a little fuzzy
> on some
> > details of a prior battle.
> >
> > 2. The capture function of Dynagen is killer. Definitely
> beats debug
> > output when you're really trying to understand what's going
> on under
> > the hood. If you're proficient w/ Wireshark or any other PA
> that can
> > open a .cap file, this is a "ki ller app" for sur e."
> >
> > Dynamips is nothing short of revolutionary for understanding,
> > troubleshooting, prototyping, and generally poking and
> prodding
> > network-related protocols. It has some limitations, yet in
> its
> > infancy. Know those and live with them. And then leverage a
> tool
> > that can only be bested by some seriously deep pockets...
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Scott
> >
> > -------- Original MessageGr --------
> > Subject: Virtual CCIE's?
> > From: "Gregory Gombas" < ggombas@gmail.com>
> > Date: Mon, August 20, 2007 6:19 pm
> > To: "Cisco certification" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> >
> > Guys,
> >
> > I was checking out Dynamips and its pretty cool and all,
> but it
> > does
> > worry me a little bit....
> >
> > How will employers view the CCIE certification after
> they've been
> > burned by hiring a CCIE who has never touched a real router
> in
> > their
> > life?
> >
> > Do you like the idea of a pilot flying your plane whose
> only
> > training
> > was with a virtual flight simulator?
> >
> > ; I remember the days when the MCSE was a hot cert until an
> army of
> > paper CCIE's hit the job market.
> >
> > Maybe they won't call it a paper CCIE, maybe they'll coin a
> new
> > term
> > like virtual CCIE.
> >
> > Just food for thought...
> >
> >
> >
>
  _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
>
  _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
  _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
  _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

  _______________________________________________________________________
  Subscription information may be found at:
  http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

  _______________________________________________________________________
  Subscription information may be found at:
  http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 01 2007 - 11:32:12 ART