From: Scott Morris (smorris@ipexpert.com)
Date: Fri Aug 17 2007 - 12:09:39 ART
Most "normal" people would use one ACE per network. :) In the CCIE lab,
though, you may be asked for fewer lines. In which case, I'd use the mask
you had there. Just remember "no more, no less" when doing that!
Cheers,
Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, JNCIE
#153, CISSP, et al.
CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-J
VP - Technical Training - IPexpert, Inc.
IPexpert Sr. Technical Instructor
A Cisco Learning Partner - We Accept Learning Credits!
smorris@ipexpert.com
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Fax: +1.810.454.0130
http://www.ipexpert.com
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Toh
Soon, Lim
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2007 8:06 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Would you use the least statement to accomplish this task?
Hi All,
If you were asked to configure a route-map to match the following routes:
72.164.208.0/24
72.164.240.0/24
72.172.208.0/24
72.172.240.0/24
Would you create an ACL with 4 entries or take the trouble to "compact" the
entries into a single statement (in this case, it can be done), e.g.
access-list 1 permit 72.164.208.0 0.8.32.255
which matches all the above 4 routes, all the same.
I guess unless the question asks to use the least statement to accomplish
the task, I will just configure one ACE per route to be safe.
Any opinion is welcome.
Thank you.
B.Rgds,
Lim TS
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 01 2007 - 11:32:11 ART