From: Brian McGahan (bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com)
Date: Wed Aug 15 2007 - 16:04:09 ART
At least one subnet of the summary must be in the EIGRP database.
It can get there from learning it from another neighbor or you originating
the prefix locally with a network statement or redistribution.
HTH,
Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593 (R&S/SP/Security)
bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com
Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
Toll Free: 877-224-8987 x 705
Outside US: 775-826-4344 x 705
24/7 Support: http://forum.internetworkexpert.com
Live Chat: http://www.internetworkexpert.com/chat/
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Julio Carrasco
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2007 12:48 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Little question about EIGRP summary address
Hello Group,
It4s necessary to configure a component of a summary route under the EIGRP
proccess to announce the summary address ?, or it is just enough having a
component of the sumary route in the routing table ?
i.e.
R1 s0/0-------------------------------- s0/0 R2 .2 -------10.0.0.0/24 lan
segment
.1 1.1.1.0/24 network .2
R2 config:
interface s0/0
ip address 1.1.1.2 255.255.255.0
ip summary-address eigrp 10 10.0.0.0 255.0.0.0
!
router eigrp 10
network 1.1.1.2 0.0.0.0
network 10.0.0.2 0.0.0.0 --> Do I need to add this to my config if I want
R2
to announce the summary route ??
!
Is this enough so R2 announces 10.0.0.0/8 network to R1,
or do I need to configure a component of the 10.0.0.0/8 network unter the
EIGRP 10 proccess ??
TIA
Julio
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 01 2007 - 11:32:11 ART