Fwd: Redistribution between RIP and OSPF ....

From: NITIN NITIN (ccie_study_123@yahoo.com)
Date: Tue Aug 14 2007 - 23:04:00 ART


Hi ,
   
  even ME 2 haave this doubt ..... Please clarify experts ..
   
  Thanks and regard
   
   
  
Note: forwarded message attached.

       
---------------------------------
Yahoo! oneSearch: Finally, mobile search that gives answers, not web links.
X-Apparently-To: ccie_study_123@yahoo.com via 69.147.75.99; Tue, 14 Aug
  2007 11:10:33 -0700
X-YahooFilteredBulk: 207.44.210.9
X-Originating-IP: [207.44.210.9]
Authentication-Results: mta149.mail.re3.yahoo.com from=groupstudy.com;
  domainkeys=fail (bad syntax)
Received: from 207.44.210.9 (EHLO lists.groupstudy.com) (207.44.210.9)
  by mta149.mail.re3.yahoo.com with SMTP; Tue, 14 Aug 2007 11:09:55
  -0700
Received: (from sympa@localhost) by lists.groupstudy.com
  (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.6) id l7EI8Xlo005339; Tue, 14 Aug 2007 14:08:33
  -0400
Received: from groupstudy.com (www.groupstudy.com [209.51.144.7]) by
  lists.groupstudy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.6) with ESMTP id
  l7EHpVx4005007 for <ccielab@lists.groupstudy.com>; Tue, 14 Aug 2007
  13:51:31 -0400
Received: from groupstudy.com (groupstudy.com [127.0.0.1]) by
  groupstudy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l7EHpcU0027239
  GroupStudy Mailer; Tue, 14 Aug 2007 13:51:38 -0400
Received: (from listserver@localhost) by groupstudy.com
  (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/Submit) id l7EHpc02027235 for
  ccielabxhiddenx; Tue, 14 Aug 2007 13:51:38 -0400
Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com
  [64.233.166.177]) by groupstudy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with
  ESMTP id l7EHpbOC027205 GroupStudy Mailer; Tue, 14 Aug 2007 13:51:37
  -0400
Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id a25so3187756pyi for
  <ccielab@groupstudy.com>; Tue, 14 Aug 2007 10:51:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta;
  h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type;
  b=HxLb6aGuBFVsJba+JzEoGCDblqPKErXPLhOMtAvWhg+m5yV0DQdDzHjDl9N6dFRaPoyrNtO4SeRs1+12DNT5bSINVNG0fa2ax8Ai3EHEdjW5jVbelj4ErIW5bQ3XbvqapkAt8pEXyhaJf8d7TxMJI06uvoz7btBGyY+UvOGZhmI=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta;
  h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type;
  b=lZxEOASNJPKNIl+g+Jq4CHmwtYNZ4uJiNp+N9tXVEp8ndPRefm1yKE5c2ObQ8puCVXC2JMko05nfYe4C0k94DYF8npKQHjZe7ZNdxvQS3w9dKKf2WIlnK/2Cr5D5lYX6Im0Y4FpyU2BKlffWdEnHDt/ZWWP/VdOvIyO56hSkNKE=
Received: by 10.35.41.12 with SMTP id t12mr9937787pyj.1187113890124;
  Tue, 14 Aug 2007 10:51:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.35.122.9 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Aug 2007 10:51:30 -0700
  (PDT)
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 01:51:30 +0800
From: ccie1101 <ccie1101@gmail.com>
To: "Cisco certification" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Subject: Redistribution between RIP and OSPF ....
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by GroupStudy
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain
X-ASK-Info: Whitelist match [from ccie1101@gmail\.com] (2007/08/14
  13:51:38)
Sender: nobody@groupstudy.com
Reply-To: ccie1101 <ccie1101@gmail.com>
X-Loop: ccielab@groupstudy.com
X-Sequence: 20059
Errors-to: ccielab-owner@groupstudy.com
Precedence: bulk
X-no-archive: yes
List-Id: <ccielab.groupstudy.com>
List-Help: <mailto:sympa@groupstudy.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:sympa@groupstudy.com?subject=subscribe%20ccielab>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:sympa@groupstudy.com?subject=unsubscribe%20ccielab>
List-Post: <mailto:ccielab@groupstudy.com>
List-Owner: <mailto:ccielab-request@groupstudy.com>

Hi GS,
      I am confused about redistribution between rip and ospf .... *1)* My
question is that when we redistribute between RIP and OSPF, do we need to
lower the AD to 109 so that ospf routes can be redistributed into rip or *Case
2* would work ? *2)* Under which scneario should we use the 'distance 109'
command under the router rip mode ?

*Case 1*:
--------------------------------------------------------
router rip
distance 109
redistribute ospf 1 metric 1
!
!
router ospf 1
redistribute rip subnets
!
--------------------------------------------------------
*Case 2*:
 --------------------------------------------------------
router rip
redistribute ospf 1 metric 1
!
router ospf 1
redistribute rip subnets
!
--------------------------------------------------------

Thank you,

Cheers,

ccie1101.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 01 2007 - 11:32:11 ART