iewb v3 lab4 task 8.1 frame-relay QOS

From: slevin kremera (slevin.kremera@gmail.com)
Date: Mon Aug 13 2007 - 22:02:47 ART

• Next message: Guyler, Rik: "RE: etherchannel and spanning-tree forwarding state iewb-v3"
• Previous message: slevin kremera: "Re: etherchannel and spanning-tree forwarding state iewb-v3"
• Next in thread: Joseph Brunner: "RE: iewb v3 lab4 task 8.1 frame-relay QOS"
• Maybe reply: Joseph Brunner: "RE: iewb v3 lab4 task 8.1 frame-relay QOS"
• Maybe reply: Steve: "Re: iewb v3 lab4 task 8.1 frame-relay QOS"
• Maybe reply: slevin kremera: "Re: iewb v3 lab4 task 8.1 frame-relay QOS"
• Maybe reply: Steve: "Re: iewb v3 lab4 task 8.1 frame-relay QOS"
• Maybe reply: dee: "Re: iewb v3 lab4 task 8.1 frame-relay QOS"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi Group

The CIR part makes sense.But how did he get Bc?? and how is the last bit
where it says R1 and R3 should be able to trasmit a maximum of 3584 byres
shaping interval and R2 and R3 shud be able to transmit a maximum of 2560
bytes.

Is it that the last bit was used to calculate Bc ? if so how??

thks

• Next message: Guyler, Rik: "RE: etherchannel and spanning-tree forwarding state iewb-v3"
• Previous message: slevin kremera: "Re: etherchannel and spanning-tree forwarding state iewb-v3"
• Next in thread: Joseph Brunner: "RE: iewb v3 lab4 task 8.1 frame-relay QOS"
• Maybe reply: Joseph Brunner: "RE: iewb v3 lab4 task 8.1 frame-relay QOS"
• Maybe reply: Steve: "Re: iewb v3 lab4 task 8.1 frame-relay QOS"
• Maybe reply: slevin kremera: "Re: iewb v3 lab4 task 8.1 frame-relay QOS"
• Maybe reply: Steve: "Re: iewb v3 lab4 task 8.1 frame-relay QOS"
• Maybe reply: dee: "Re: iewb v3 lab4 task 8.1 frame-relay QOS"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 01 2007 - 11:32:11 ART