From: spduo (frenzeus@streamyx.com)
Date: Mon Aug 13 2007 - 14:12:17 ART
AFAIK you do not need to do a shut/no shut on the ppp encapsulated
interface. Just configure a "no peer neighbor-route" under the interface and
do a "clear ip route *". I'm running 12.3(14)T7.
Rack01R3#sh run int s1/3
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 136 bytes
!
interface Serial1/3
ip address 1.1.23.3 255.255.255.0
encapsulation ppp
serial restart-delay 0
no dce-terminal-timing-enable
end
Rack01R3#pi 1.1.23.2
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 1.1.23.2, timeout is 2 seconds:
!!!!!
Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 8/20/52 ms
Rack01R3#sh ip ro conn
1.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks
C 1.1.23.2/32 is directly connected, Serial1/3
C 1.1.23.0/24 is directly connected, Serial1/3
Rack01R3#conf t
Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z.
Rack01R3(config)#int s1/3
Rack01R3(config-if)#no peer neighbor-route
Rack01R3(config-if)#^Z
Rack01R3#sh run int s1/
*Mar 1 00:03:04.851: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by console
Rack01R3#sh run int s1/3
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 160 bytes
!
interface Serial1/3
ip address 1.1.23.3 255.255.255.0
encapsulation ppp
no peer neighbor-route
serial restart-delay 0
no dce-terminal-timing-enable
end
Rack01R3#clea ip route *
Rack01R3#sh ip ro conn
1.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
C 1.1.23.0 is directly connected, Serial1/3
Rack01R3#
----- Original Message -----
From: "Han Solo" <hansolo@ccieunix.com>
To: "Ryan" <ryan95842@gmail.com>
Cc: "CCIE at groupstudy.com" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2007 5:25 AM
Subject: Re: ppp peer route /32 route
> Oopsie , thanks Ryan that worked
>
>
> On Sun, 12 Aug 2007, Ryan wrote:
>
>> You need to shut/no shut the interface to get PPP to renegotiate. Then it
>> should be gone.
>>
>> -Ryan
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 8/12/07, Han Solo <hansolo@ccieunix.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On a p2p interface encaped with ppp. Automatically you get the /32 in
>>> each
>>> others routing tables. If you have to remove that so it shows up on NO
>>> ip
>>> routing tables , I believe you do the no peer neighbor-route , so now I
>>> should'nt see the /32 in other ip routing tables. I have that and
>>> cleared
>>> routes and it's still there ? Is that not right
>>>
>>> thanks
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 01 2007 - 11:32:11 ART