From: Scott Morris (smorris@uber-geek.net)
Date: Sun Aug 12 2007 - 14:31:06 ART
Should work fine.
If you forgot to put "no switchport" on, you'd get an invalid command
response.
If you had a different mask/overlap on a different port, you'd get
"163.1.0.1 overlaps with (other intf)"
Otherwise, that works. If you were accidently typing in "ip address
163.1.0.0 255.255.255.128" though, you would get that error.
HTH,
Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, JNCIE
#153, CISSP, et al.
CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-J
VP - Technical Training - IPexpert, Inc.
IPexpert Sr. Technical Instructor
A Cisco Learning Partner - We Accept Learning Credits!
smorris@ipexpert.com
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Fax: +1.810.454.0130
http://www.ipexpert.com
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Ben
Mussa
Sent: Sunday, August 12, 2007 12:51 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Bad mask
Hello GS,
when i configure my interface with this ip address below i get an error
message. i checked the solution guide same ip address but i am still getting
bad mask errors. can someone advise?
thanks
Rack1SW1(config)#interface Port-channel14
Rack1SW1(config-if)#ip address 163.1.0.1 255.255.255.128 Bad mask /25 for
address 163.1.0.1
---------------------------------
Luggage? GPS? Comic books?
Check out fitting gifts for grads at Yahoo! Search.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 01 2007 - 11:32:10 ART