From: Djerk Geurts (djerk@djerk.nl)
Date: Wed Aug 08 2007 - 08:37:23 ART
But as mentioned earlier on this list becarefull as the script might
interpret this as a configured static route. Best to ask the proctor, but it
is a nice option. I wonder if it's redistributed when redistributing
statics...
Djerk
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On
> Behalf Of Antonio Soares
> Sent: woensdag 8 augustus 2007 13:10
> To: 'Gregory Gombas'; 'Group study'
> Subject: RE: Best way to advertise a NAT pool?
>
> There is the "add-route" option:
>
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Router(config)#ip nat pool TEST 10.10.10.0 10.10.10.255
> prefix-length 24
> add-route
> Router(config)#end
> Router#
> *Jul 30 20:04:30.847: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on
> Interface NVI0,
> changed state to up
> Router#
> Router#sh ip route
> Codes: C - connected, S - static, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP
> D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area
> N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2
> E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2
> i - IS-IS, su - IS-IS summary, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2
> - IS-IS level-2
> ia - IS-IS inter area, * - candidate default, U -
> per-user static
> route
> o - ODR, P - periodic downloaded static route
>
> Gateway of last resort is not set
>
> 10.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
> S 10.10.10.0 [0/0] via 0.0.0.0, NVI0
> Router#
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> This keyword was introduced in 12.3(14)T.
>
> Regards,
>
> Antonio Soares
> CCIE #18473, CCNP, CCIP
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On
> Behalf Of
> Gregory Gombas
> Sent: quarta-feira, 8 de Agosto de 2007 2:31
> To: Group study
> Subject: Best way to advertise a NAT pool?
>
> Being that a NAT pool technically does not belong to an
> interface, what is
> the best way to get a routing protocol to advertise the pool?
>
> The only way I know of is pointing a static route to the null
> interface or
> loopback interface and then redistributing the static...but
> as you know the
> CCIE lab is not very fond of statics.
>
> What other ways are there? What is the best way?
>
> Thanks,
> Greg
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> _________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> _________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 01 2007 - 11:32:10 ART