RE: Re :HSRP Tracking .... IE Lab 1, Task 10.2

From: Djerk Geurts (djerk@djerk.nl)
Date: Tue Aug 07 2007 - 07:14:03 ART


Don't forget to set preempt on both sides...

Djerk

> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On
> Behalf Of Ian Blaney
> Sent: dinsdag 7 augustus 2007 11:53
> To: Sangeetha Nadarajah
> Cc: Cisco certification
> Subject: Re: Re :HSRP Tracking .... IE Lab 1, Task 10.2
>
> Hi Sangeetha
>
> The priority is reduced by the amount you configure on the
> track command. In
> your case if S0/0 goes down on R5 the priority will reduce to
> 90 (150-60).
> SW4 will then take over as master as it now has the higher
> priority (default
> of 100)
>
> Check out this link
>
> http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/619/6.html
>
> Ian
>
> On 8/7/07, Sangeetha Nadarajah <ccie1101@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> > Just want to confirm that I got my understanding on
> hsrp tracking
> > right
> > ...
> >
> > *On R5*
> > int e0/0
> > ip add 183.1.105.5 255.255.255.0
> > standby 1 ip 183.1.105.254
> > standby 1 ip priority 150
> > standby 1 preempt
> > standby 1 track s0/0 60
> > !
> > !
> > *On Sw4*
> > int fa0/18
> > ip add 183.1.105.10 255.255.255.0
> > standby 1 ip 183.1.105.254
> >
> > This would mean that if s0/0 that is connected to R5 lost its
> > connected,
> > then SW4 would take over as it is priority would be 100 and
> that of R5
> > would
> > be 40.
> > Is my understanding correct on hsrp tracking ?
> >
> > Pls advice,
> >
> > Thank you,
> >
> > - ccie1101 -
> >
> >
> ______________________________________________________________
> _________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> _________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 01 2007 - 11:32:09 ART