From: tom nohwa (tom.nohwa@gmail.com)
Date: Wed Aug 01 2007 - 07:24:42 ART
Hi all,
Thanks for your comments.
Let me explain you the wrong question without breaking the NDA.
If the question asks to configure two routers and keep this or that interace
in area 0/1. Then, as a candidate, you do the configuration as per the
question. This is a simple configuration. When it comes to the
reachability, the configuration does not work. Then, try, try..... approach
the proctor.
The proctor says the question is wrong and this or that interface should be
in area 0/1.
So the question itself is wrong. Proctor takes time to check and I also
take time to check. All these consume my 8 hour because of wrong question.
If the proctor/exam management checked
it before the exam, i would not have wasted my time. I think my exam fee
covers that also. Otherwise, there should be guidelines that you should
look at the question carefully and correct the wrong question as part of
troubleshooting process.
As a candidate for the exam, I know that I should follow the direction or
answer the questions given in the question papers. Please note that I am not
talking about the initial configuration/configuration errors introduced as
part of troubleshooting (this was posted by several members in this forum).
I am talking about the error in the question paper.
-Tom
On 8/1/07, Jens Petter Eikeland < jenseike@start.no> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am not quite sure what you mean with "wrong question", but if this is
> something you discover - maybe you should have aproche the proctor before
> it
> had been two hours?.. I got one time, the totaly wrong question set, but I
> discovrered this quickly by looking at the pre config on the routers and
> the
> proctor changed the pre config and I got 1 extra hour for my lab.. I think
> that it will be hard for you to profe this afterwords. I dont think that
> they will compancate this now. Maybe if you had informed the proctor
> before
> hand and he had known how much time you lost..
>
> just my 5 cent!!!
>
> Jens
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "K S" <kotiss@hotmail.com>
> To: < tom.nohwa@gmail.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2007 11:29 AM
> Subject: RE: ccie lab RS - Facts
>
>
> > Hi Tom,
> >
> > I had similar incident two months ago in Brussels lost my time about
> an
> > hour aggree the fact that cisco should offer some kind of compensation
> > for these kind of errors
> >
> > Good luck.
> >
> > koti
> >
> >
> >
> >>From: "tom nohwa" <tom.nohwa@gmail.com>
> >>Reply-To: "tom nohwa" < tom.nohwa@gmail.com>
> >>To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> >>Subject: ccie lab RS - Facts
> >>Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 11:11:54 +0200
> >>
> >>Hi all,
> >>
> >>The intention of this mail is to explain certain facts about the ccie
> lab
> >>which is organized by cisco
> >>
> >>I attempted the rs lab a few weeks ago and had a wrong question (I found
>
> >>one
> >>only, but I don't know how many others). After spending 2 hours, I
> >>approached the Proctor for clarifications. He also confirmed that the
> >>question was wrong and corrected the mistake.
> >>
> >>I filed a case through cisco support service mentioning the following
> and
> >>demanded for free lab.
> >>
> >>- the lab confirmation email or ccie lab web site do not contain any
> >>guidelines that wrong question will be introduced in the question paper
> >>and the candidate should correct it.
> >>- as a candidate for any exam, one expect that the questions in the
> >>question paper are correct
> >>questions.
> >>
> >>It is now almost more than 3 weeks and I have not received any decision
> >>from
> >>cisco.
> >>I am still waiting for their answer.
> >>
> >>They introduce the wrong questions and expect the working configuration.
>
> >>THIS IS only POSSIBLE for the GUY who developed the questions.
> >>
> >>I am not sure how many of you had the same problem.
> >>
> >>Please let me know your comments.
> >>
> >>- Tom
> >>
> >>_______________________________________________________________________
> >>Subscription information may be found at:
> >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Got a favourite clothes shop, bar or restaurant? Share your local
> > knowledge http://www.backofmyhand.com
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> > .
> >
> > __________ NOD32 2430 (20070731) Information __________
> >
> > This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
> > http://www.eset.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 01 2007 - 11:32:09 ART