RE: Connected interface appear as External

From: Prasad Shemrudkar (pshemrud) (pshemrud@cisco.com)
Date: Tue Jul 31 2007 - 08:07:57 ART


Herbert,

The routing table of the router on which connected is redistributed, can
not show it as external as the CONNECTED with AD of 0 will always be
preferred over any external AD of ANY routing protocol.

-----Original Message-----
From: Herbert Maosa [mailto:asawilunda@googlemail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2007 4:26 PM
To: Prasad Shemrudkar (pshemrud)
Cc: Djerk Geurts; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Connected interface appear as External

It should appear as external if the protocol has not been enabled on
the interface, ie, the network command is specific enough to exclude
this particular connected interface.

Another way ( if statics are permitted ) is to configure a static
route for this connected interface with a 32 bit mask and redistribute
that static. Since the connected interface is likely at least a 30 bit
mask, the 32 bit mask will appear as a different ip address...

Herbert.

On 7/31/07, Prasad Shemrudkar (pshemrud) <pshemrud@cisco.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Even if you redistribute, it will still appear as CONNECTED on the
> router it is redistributed. Only in the next router will it be seen as
D
> EX.
>
> But that's just my understanding, I may be wrong!!
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
Of
> Djerk Geurts
> Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2007 1:15 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: Connected interface appear as External
>
> First thing that comes to mind is redistribution. Afaik redistributed
> routes
> can be marked as external.
>
> Djerk
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On
> > Behalf Of CCIE 19999
> > Sent: maandag 30 juli 2007 22:55
> > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: Connected interface appear as External
> >
> > Hi Folks,
> >
> >
> >
> > Is there a way actually you can make a connected prefix
> > appear as external?
> >
> > For example, 151.10.1.2 is a connected interface on R1 and the
routing
> > protocol is EIGRP.
> >
> > I am wondering if it is possible to make the prefix appear as
> > D EX in router
> > R1 instead of as Connected.
> >
> >
> >
> > TIA,
> >
> > Shine
> >
> > ______________________________________________________________
> > _________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Aug 18 2007 - 08:17:42 ART