From: Prasad Shemrudkar (pshemrud) (pshemrud@cisco.com)
Date: Thu Jul 26 2007 - 05:11:43 ART
Hi Ben,
I think this will be typically seen in a scenario where the task asks
you to advertise a directly connected interface into RIP without using
network x.x.x.x command under router rip.
HTH,
Prasad.
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Ben
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2007 11:33 AM
To: Cisco certification
Subject: RIP redistribution
Hi
As I understand IGP redistribution, it redistributes all the routes from
the
source IGP, as well as connected routes on which the source IGP has been
enabled. Most examples I have seen of redistribution between RIP and
other
IGPs also include "redistribute connected" into RIP, even when there is
no
route-map filtering the redistribution of the other IGP into RIP.
For example, you will typically see the following:
router ospf 1
red rip sub
router rip
red ospf 1 metric 1
red conn metric 1
Why do we need to explicitly redistribute connected routes into RIP,
when
this action is already implicit in the IGP (OSPF) redistribution into
RIP?
TIA
Ben
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Aug 18 2007 - 08:17:42 ART