From: Ben (bmunyao@gmail.com)
Date: Fri Jul 20 2007 - 11:02:14 ART
This is useful if the next hop address is not directly connected, prompting
a recursive lookup. The "interface" in ip route command ensures traffic for
the prefix will only be sent if the recursive lookup identifies that
interface as the outgoing interface to the next hop.
HTH
Ben
On 7/20/07, Radioactive Frog <pbhatkoti@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> Let's assume, the following is an example:
>
>
> R1--------------------------------------R2
>
> R1 WAN IP=192.168.1.1/30 (serial 0)
> R2 WAN IP=192.168.1.1/30 (serial 0)
>
> What is the benifit if I put the following route in the routing table on
> r1
> and r2:
>
> R1 router:
> ---------------
> ip route < R2 LAN ip add> <mask> serial 0 192.168.1.2
>
> R2 router:
> ---------------
> ip route < R1 LAN ip add> <mask> serial 0 192.168.1.1
>
>
> Kinda sort of double gateway e.g. serial0 and next hop.
>
> When should we worry about putting two type of next hop address?
>
>
>
> Frog
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Aug 18 2007 - 08:17:41 ART