From: Carlos G Mendioroz (tron@huapi.ba.ar)
Date: Wed Jul 18 2007 - 10:50:20 ART
Just a late comment.
MST is not restricted to 2 instances. It can support up to 65
instances per region. So you can fine tune your network.
Fine tunning, though, is complexity in design and support.
Auto QOS in the same line, is better than making your classes ? :)
-Carlos
Mike Kraus (mikraus) @ 29/6/2007 10:01 GMT -0300 dixit:
> MST - 802.1w support for faster convergence & Industry standard.
>
> Wouldn't even compare it against PVST anymore... However, I would
> compare it against Rapid-PVST.
>
> Rapid-PVST - Perceived as easier to configure than MST, allows for more
> spanning-tree instances (64 is normally enough unless all of your VLANs
> have a different topology).
>
> Bottom-line, I would say most people in an all Cisco environment go
> Rapid-PVST (or PVST). In mixed-vendor, I would do MST.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> ali hassan
> Sent: Friday, June 29, 2007 5:06 AM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: pvst vs mst
>
> Hi folks,
> i m in the middle of choosing mst over pvst in my data center with over
> 100 vlan.
> if anyone can suggest me with the benefits of it over pvst it will be of
> great help.
>
> ragards ali
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Building a website is a piece of cake.
> Yahoo! Small Business gives you all the tools to get online.
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
-- Carlos G Mendioroz <tron@huapi.ba.ar> LW7 EQI Argentina
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Aug 18 2007 - 08:17:41 ART