From: Ben (bmunyao@gmail.com)
Date: Mon Jul 16 2007 - 11:35:07 ART
Antonio,
You are correct. port-priority in the first example is configured on
SwitchA, so it would have to be the root. pathcost is also configured on
SwitchA in the second example, which would require SwitchB to be the root
for that spanning tree optimization.
Ben
On 7/16/07, Antonio Soares <amsoares@netcabo.pt> wrote:
>
> Hello group,
>
> I was reviewing the STP Load Sharing topic and i couldn't believe what i
> saw. In the DocCD there are two examples. One using Port-Priority, the
> other
> using Path Cost:
>
>
> http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/cat3560/12237se/scg/swvl
> an.htm#wp1139757
>
>
> But they are missing one fundamental point here: who is the root switch
> ???
>
> For the Port-Priority example to work, Sw1 must be the root switch.
>
> For the Path Cost example to work, Sw2 must be the root switch.
>
>
> Please correct me if i'm missing something here.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Antonio
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Aug 18 2007 - 08:17:41 ART