From: sam s (samarth_04@hotmail.com)
Date: Sat Jul 14 2007 - 15:30:06 ART
I would be more precise in the lab. It also depends on where the rpf failure
is occuring for you to put the static mroutes...
Best Wishes,
SAMARTH
> From: amsoares@netcabo.pt> To: bmunyao@gmail.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Subject: RE: static multicast routes in sparse mode> Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2007
17:14:49 +0100> > That's a very good question. I've seen both type of
solutions for the same> type of questions. Here i would check with the
proctor. > > -----Original Message-----> From: nobody@groupstudy.com
[mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Ben> Sent: sabado, 14 de Julho de
2007 16:44> To: ccie forum> Subject: static multicast routes in sparse mode> >
I can think of two situations for static mroutes.> > 1. You have a tunnel, and
need your multicast traffic to use it 2. The IGP> routes do not follow the
same path as your multicast topology.> > For dense mode, all mutlicast traffic
is from source to receivers. the> static mroute is therefore pretty
straightforward> > ip mroute source-net mask tu1> > For sparse mode, you need
a static mroute for both the source, and RP. I> typically use the following to
cover traffic to both source and RP:> > ip mroute 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 tu1> > In
the lab, do they expect more precise mroutes (example below)?> > ip mroute
source-net mask tu1> ip mroute RP-net mask tu1> > Would appreciate your
comments> > > Ben> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Aug 18 2007 - 08:17:41 ART