From: Marvin Greenlee (marvin@ipexpert.com)
Date: Fri Jul 13 2007 - 02:44:59 ART
Regardless of what anyone on the list has as their opinion, the best course
of action with regards to the lab is to ask the proctor directly for
clarification. "Should my frame relay interface addresses be pingable by
the local routers?"
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Ben
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2007 1:29 AM
To: Edison Ortiz
Cc: Stephen Lee; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Frame relay map
When lab instruction asks for full reachability, do they mean FR physical
interfaces, and FR multipoint interfaces should also be pingable by the
local routers?
Ben
On 7/12/07, Edison Ortiz <edisonmortiz@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> If you create a point-to-point sub-interface, you should be able to ping
> the
> IP address.
>
> R1#sh frame map
> Serial1/0.2 (up): point-to-point dlci, dlci 202(0xCA,0x30A0), broadcast
> status defined, active
> Serial1/0.1 (up): point-to-point dlci, dlci 201(0xC9,0x3090), broadcast
> status defined, active
> Serial1/0.3 (up): point-to-point dlci, dlci 203(0xCB,0x30B0), broadcast
> status defined, active
> R1#sh ip int bri
> Interface IP-Address OK? Method Status
> Protocol
> Serial1/0 unassigned YES NVRAM up
> up
> Serial1/0.1 10.141.14.1 YES NVRAM up
> up
> Serial1/0.2 10.141.15.1 YES NVRAM up
> up
> Serial1/0.3 10.141.16.1 YES NVRAM up
> up
>
> R1#ping 10.141.14.1
>
> Type escape sequence to abort.
> Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 10.141.14.1, timeout is 2 seconds:
> !!!!!
> Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 80/84/92 ms
> R1#ping 10.141.15.1
>
> Type escape sequence to abort.
> Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 10.141.15.1, timeout is 2 seconds:
> !!!!!
> Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 80/80/80 ms
> R1#ping 10.141.16.1
>
> Type escape sequence to abort.
> Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 10.141.16.1, timeout is 2 seconds:
> !!!!!
> Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 80/83/88 ms
> R1#
>
>
> Edison Ortiz
> Routing and Switching, CCIE # 17943
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Stephen Lee
> Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2007 2:24 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Frame relay map
>
> I have a quick question. Is creating a "frame-relay map ip x.x.x.x XXX"
> the "accepted" way (or only way) of achieving the goal of being able to
> ping
> ones own frame relay interface.
>
> Thanks,
> Steve
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Aug 18 2007 - 08:17:40 ART