From: George Roman (georgeroman@gmail.com)
Date: Wed Jul 11 2007 - 07:45:14 ART
Well, my guess is that they are looking for working solutions only and if
your network works perfect (in the way they requested), they will score you
with the maximum number of points.
George
On 7/11/07, Salau, Yemi <yemi.salau@siemens.com> wrote:
>
> Me too George, wouldn't be an hypocrite to suggest otherwise. Like I
> said, it depends on the school of thought you belong to.
>
> But Cristian's question was if points will be deducted in the lab for not
> using 0.0.0.0
>
> Many Thanks
>
> Yemi Salau
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* George Roman [mailto:georgeroman@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 11, 2007 11:22 AM
> *To:* Salau, Yemi; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> *Subject:* Re: do not send Eigrp Hello on interfaces
>
> I will use 0.0.0.0 wildcard mask wherever possible because it gives you
> granularity and flexibility in the same time.
>
>
> Best Regards,
> George
>
> On 7/11/07, Salau, Yemi <yemi.salau@siemens.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Also this problem rise another one. What is the best way to announce net
> > in a protocol?
> >
> > "That will depend on the school of thought you follow"
> >
> > Just to put the interface in the protocol with same command (where the
> > protocol permit) or to announce the entire network?
> >
> > A school of thought prefers matching specific interface, that way you
> > can control on which interface routing protocols are "activated" on, so
> > that when newer interfaces are configured under that subnet, they would
> > not participate in the routing process especially when you don't want to
> > allow them to.
> >
> > What do you think about the grading in the real exam? I will get the
> > points if i announce the /32 net. (of course if the task does not
> > restrict me in any way, just says put this net/interface in the protocol
> > domain)
> >
> > This doesn't deduct your points I would imagine, but you need to be
> > aware of this: if the interface has mask of /24 and you bring it into
> > EIGRP, it's network will come in as /24 wether you use "network x.x.x.x
> > 0.0.0.0" or "network x.x.x.x 0.0.0.255"
> >
> > But if the interface has a mask of /32, it's network will come in as
> > /32. The only exception I can think of is bringing in loopback
> > interfaces into OSPF, those are treated as host routes by default and
> > you need to made changes if required.
> >
> > But the bottom line is, no one will deduct you points so far at the end
> > of the day you activate the routing process on required interfaces.
> >
> >
> > Many Thanks
> >
> > Yemi Salau
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> > Cristian Ionescu
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2007 8:13 AM
> > To: Dan C
> > Cc: George Roman; Mark Mckillop (mmckillo); ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: Re: do not send Eigrp Hello on interfaces
> >
> > Thanks for all responses.
> > I think the optin with net x.x.x.x 0.0.0.0 is the right one. I do not
> > think that ACL is the soltion.
> >
> > Also this problem rise another one.
> > What is the best way to announce net in a protocol?
> > Just to put the interface in the protocol with same command (where the
> > protocol permit) or to announce the entire network?
> > What do you think about the grading in the real exam? I will get the
> > points if i announce the /32 net. (of course if the task does not
> > restrict me in any way, just says put this net/interface in the protocol
> >
> > domain)
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Dan C wrote:
> > > Hi George,
> > >
> > > If you need to add any other interfaces into eigrp you will need just
> > to use
> > > 0.0.0.0 for them again eg:
> > >
> > > router ei 100
> > > net 1.1.1.1 0.0.0.0
> > > net 1.1.2.1 0.0.0.0
> > >
> > > this way no hellos will be sent out but on those 2 interfaces.... You
> > can
> > > verify using debug eigrp packets hello
> > > Cheers,
> > > Dan
> > >
> > > On 7/10/07, George Roman <georgeroman@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> You are right about that. if you put the wildcard mask of 0.0.0.0
> > only
> > >> that
> > >> interface will participate in eigrp process, but if you want some
> > other
> > >> networks (on other interfaces) to get advertised into eigrp, i think
> > the
> > >> only solution is to put those interfaces in eigrp and use ACLs so you
> >
> > will
> > >> not send hellos on them (ACLs because as Cristian said, the
> > >> passive-interface command is forbidden).
> > >>
> > >> George
> > >>
> > >> On 7/10/07, Mark Mckillop (mmckillo) < mmckillo@cisco.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> I think the point is to use the 0.0.0.0 in the network statement to
> > >>> specify just the precise interfaces that you want enabled in the
> > EIGRP
> > >>> process.
> > >>>
> > >>> i.e. network 150.1.1.1 0.0.0.0 -> Just the interface with that
> > specific
> > >>> address
> > >>>
> > >>> Mark.
> > >>>
> > >>> -----Original Message-----
> > >>> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto: nobody@groupstudy.com] On
> > Behalf
> > Of
> > >>> George Roman
> > >>> Sent: 10 July 2007 12:32
> > >>> To: Cristian Ionescu; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > >>> Subject: Re: do not send Eigrp Hello on interfaces
> > >>>
> > >>> I think one of the options that you have to filter eigrp is extended
> > acl
> > >>> (specify the protocol eigrp)
> > >>>
> > >>> George
> > >>>
> > >>> On 7/10/07, Cristian Ionescu <cristian.ionescu@omnilogic.ro> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> Hi
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I have a task where it says to not send eigrp hello on interfaces
> > that
> > >>>>
> > >>>> are not part of the eigrp domain but not to use passive-interface.
> > >>>> It is ok to use neighbor?
> > >>>> I have 4 routers on domain. I need to put in one router all 3 other
> > >>>> routers?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> If i put under the router eigrp x menu, network y.y.y.y 0.0.0.0
> > will
> > >>>> have the same result?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Thanks
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > ______________________________________________________________________
> > >>>> _ Subscription information may be found at:
> > >>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > >>> Subscription information may be found at:
> > >>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > >>>
> > >>
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > >> Subscription information may be found at:
> > >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Aug 18 2007 - 08:17:40 ART