Fwd: do not send Eigrp Hello on interfaces

From: George Roman (georgeroman@gmail.com)
Date: Tue Jul 10 2007 - 08:29:58 ART


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: George Roman <georgeroman@gmail.com>
Date: Jul 10, 2007 2:29 PM
Subject: Re: do not send Eigrp Hello on interfaces
To: Cristian Ionescu <cristian.ionescu@omnilogic.ro>

Putting the neighbor statement, just transforms the multicast messages to
unicast it does not influence if an interface behaves passively or not.

On 7/10/07, Cristian Ionescu <cristian.ionescu@omnilogic.ro> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I have a task where it says to not send eigrp hello on interfaces that
> are not part of the eigrp domain but not to use passive-interface.
> It is ok to use neighbor?
> I have 4 routers on domain. I need to put in one router all 3 other
> routers?
>
> If i put under the router eigrp x menu, network y.y.y.y 0.0.0.0 will
> have the same result?
>
> Thanks
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Aug 18 2007 - 08:17:40 ART