RE: Funky acl question

From: Djerk Geurts (djerk@djerk.nl)
Date: Mon Jul 09 2007 - 08:20:03 ART

Next message: Marko Milivojevic: "Re: SP LAB DATES"
Previous message: Djerk Geurts: "RE: Funky acl question"
Maybe in reply to: Eric Dobyns: "Funky acl question"
Next in thread: Edison Ortiz: "Re: Funky acl question"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Greg,

> How about
>
> 10.0.8.0 0.0.7.255

.8 through to .15 permitted, only 10, 12, 13 and 15 allowed...

> 10.0.5.0 0.0.0.255

.5 which is correct.

>
> On 7/9/07, Eric Dobyns <eric_dobyns@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> > Take these subnets:
> >
> > 10.0.5.0/24
> > 10.0.10.0/24
> > 10.0.12.0/24
> > 10.0.13.0/24
> > 10.0.15.0/24
> >
> > And write two-line ACL to permit them without permitting 10.0.6.0/24,
> > 10.0.7.0/24..and the other subnets included in the range.

Next message: Marko Milivojevic: "Re: SP LAB DATES"
Previous message: Djerk Geurts: "RE: Funky acl question"
Maybe in reply to: Eric Dobyns: "Funky acl question"
Next in thread: Edison Ortiz: "Re: Funky acl question"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Aug 18 2007 - 08:17:40 ART