From: Ovidiu Neghina (o.neghina@gmail.com)
Date: Sun Jul 08 2007 - 14:26:30 ART
Thank you all .
I will ask the proctor :D
I was doing lab 6 from IE workbook , I used the first solution, in the
breakdown solution the second option was used.
Ovidiu
On 7/8/07, Narbik Kocharians <narbikk@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> I would definitely choose the first option; because that way you are
> advertising and NOT redistributing. But the best would be to get a
> clarification from the proctor. I agree with what Antonio wrote.
>
> On 7/8/07, Antonio Soares <amsoares@netcabo.pt> wrote:
>
> > Im my opinion, both are correct but in this case i would prefer the 1st
> > method. Maybe it would be better to check with the proctor if they have
> > any
> > preference.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> > Ovidiu Neghina
> > Sent: domingo, 8 de Julho de 2007 14:34
> > To: Cisco certification
> > Subject: wording in the lab // advertise in the OSPF domain
> >
> > Hi dear all,
> > If the ospf section of a lab requests:
> > advertise loopback 0 interfaces of R1 in the OSPF domain without using
> > network command and R1 has 3 areas: 0,27,34 what would be correct :
> >
> > 1. just pick an area and use ip ospf 1 area x under the interface, for
> > example:
> >
> > Int lo0
> > ip ospf 1 area 0
> >
> > or
> > 2. use redistribute connected
> > router ospf 1
> > redistribute connected route-map CONN->OSPF
> >
> > route-map CONN->OSPF permit 10
> > match interface lo0
> >
> > Your opinion is greatly appreciated
> >
> > All the best
> > Ovidiu
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Narbik Kocharians
> CCIE# 12410 (R&S, SP, Security)
> CCSI# 30832
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Aug 18 2007 - 08:17:40 ART