From: Darby Weaver (darbyweaver@yahoo.com)
Date: Sat Jul 07 2007 - 00:20:42 ART
To be fair, the typo was kind of obvious and the
paragraph above it was not as obvious but a second
reading should have let on that it was not correct.
Non-Native english Speakers would probably have had
some trouble there - 2 or 3 point question.
--- Eric Dobyns <eric_dobyns@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I agree. I spent $2500 in lab cost and travel. You
> would think they would
> give you a fair shake at the tree and proof their
> labs better. I was
> wondering last night how many others have failed
> that same lab and not even
> realized what the problem was. They got hosed too.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sadiq Yakasai [mailto:sadiqtanko@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, July 06, 2007 8:07 AM
> To: Radioactive Frog
> Cc: Daniel Fredrick; Eric Dobyns;
> ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: Took R&S toda
>
> to be honest i think its not fair!!
>
> if individuals would spend soo much time and effort
> to prepare for it,
> cisco should make sure they edit their exams well so
> these kinda cases
> dont come up...
>
> i remember during the ccnp exams, there were loads
> of cases of such
> nature as well!
>
> On 7/6/07, Radioactive Frog <pbhatkoti@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Damn typo!
> > $1250 dollers are not growing on the tree!.
> >
> > So will Cisco return your dollers back for the
> time you wasted trying to
> > solve their typo?
> >
> > what is the case.... What I think ..yes they
> should give you a chance +
> pay
> > for your time as well, hotel or any extra amount
> which occurs from typo.
> >
> >
> > Frog
> >
> >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Aug 18 2007 - 08:17:40 ART