From: Darby Weaver (darbyweaver@yahoo.com)
Date: Fri Jul 06 2007 - 03:05:24 ART
Yes, but if you looked at the typo like the one I had
last time around at RTP, it was fairly obvious it was
a typo. So it as not that bad. I did verify it with
the proctor.
--- Daniel Fredrick <dfredrick@gmail.com> wrote:
> That's funny... I had the same thing happen at San
> Jose as well. I spent too
> much time trying to figure out something that seemed
> impossible. Then when I
> had no choice but to question a typo on the exam...
> and exam that I paid
> $1250 dollars for... which there's no way there
> could be a typo...
>
> Bam!!! The procotor looked at it... and said...
> yep... that's a typo... it
> should be this...
>
> so yeah... if you have a question don't hesitate.
>
> On 7/5/07, Eric Dobyns <eric_dobyns@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Haven't got the results yet, but I think I'll be
> heading back to San Jose.
> > A word of caution: the exam I had today had some
> very misleading and/or
> > contradictory questions. I lost a lot of time on
> them before I went to
> > the
> > proctors about them. The proctors, in turn, sent
> me to CCO support, but
> > just some advice to the others out there..if
> something looks wrong on a
> > section, go to the proctors BEFORE you've lost a
> lot of valuable time
> > chasing your tail. In my case, I had to get Part
> B working before Part A
> > would work and I spent way too much time trying to
> get Part A to work
> > before
> > I went to the proctors and then went on to Part B.
> >
> >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Aug 18 2007 - 08:17:40 ART