RE: FR static P2P mapping on physical interfaces

From: Scott Morris (smorris@ipexpert.com)
Date: Thu Jul 05 2007 - 13:32:04 ART


IP PIM modes have to do with Multicast routing. Routing protocols using
multicast have nothing to do with multicast routing. Anything using a
224.0.0.x address is link-local only.

The problem most likely (if you do "debug ip packet") is that you'll see
"encapsulation failed" messages, which means your router doesn't know what
to do with them. The "broadcast" keyword needs to be seen on the DLCI when
you do a "show frame map" command.

HTH,

 
Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, JNCIE
#153, CISSP, et al.
CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-J
VP - Technical Training - IPexpert, Inc.
IPexpert Sr. Technical Instructor
 
A Cisco Learning Partner - We Accept Learning Credits!
 
smorris@ipexpert.com
 
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Fax: +1.810.454.0130
http://www.ipexpert.com
 

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Marko Milivojevic
Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2007 11:59 AM
To: Mike Kraus (mikraus); Ben; John Jones
Cc: Cisco certification
Subject: RE: FR static P2P mapping on physical interfaces

> Even though OSPF would be running fine, you would find that multicast
packets
> would fail to be encapsulated and would not be transmitted.

Wouldn't this be addressed with "ip pim nbma"?



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Aug 18 2007 - 08:17:39 ART