From: Gary Duncanson (gary.duncanson@googlemail.com)
Date: Thu Jul 05 2007 - 06:11:53 ART
I will take a punt and say the the loopback.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Eric Dobyns" <eric_dobyns@yahoo.com>
To: "'Narbik Kocharians'" <narbikk@gmail.com>; "'Gary Duncanson'"
<gary.duncanson@googlemail.com>
Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2007 10:18 PM
Subject: RE: PPPoFR
> Here's a question for you:
>
> If I were going to add the command "ip ospf 1 area 0" to one of the
> interfaces for that frame link, would I add it to the serial subinterface,
> the virtual template or the loopback?
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Narbik Kocharians
> Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2007 1:58 PM
> To: Gary Duncanson
> Cc: Eric Dobyns; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: PPPoFR
>
> No worries mate
>
> On 7/4/07, Gary Duncanson <gary.duncanson@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks Narbik, and thanks Eric for the config you posted.
>>
>> I can see how you would get a reply using the loopback interface.
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>
>> *From:* Narbik Kocharians <narbikk@gmail.com>
>> *To:* Gary Duncanson <gary.duncanson@googlemail.com>
>> *Cc:* eric_dobyns@yahoo.com ; Scott Morris <smorris@ipexpert.com> ;
>> ccielab@groupstudy.com
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 04, 2007 8:38 PM
>> *Subject:* Re: PPPoFR
>>
>>
>> I see your point, but this will also satisfy the requirement.
>>
>> On 7/4/07, Gary Duncanson <gary.duncanson@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > No Advanced R&S Workbook here, but a similar situation did come up on
>> > lab 3
>> > in my IPExpert Version 9.0 Workbook by Scott Morris starting on page
>> > 43!
>> >
>> > Does the ' you will be pinging another interface' hold up then if you
>> > use
>> > ipunnumbered?
>> >
>> > ----- Original Message -----
>> > From: "Eric Dobyns" < eric_dobyns@yahoo.com>
>> > To: "'Gary Duncanson'" <gary.duncanson@googlemail.com>; "'Narbik
>> > Kocharians'" <narbikk@gmail.com>
>> > Cc: <swm@emanon.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com >
>> > Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2007 7:44 PM
>> > Subject: RE: PPPoFR
>> >
>> >
>> > > That would be Lab 7 in your CCIE Advanced R&S Workbook, by Narbik
>> > > Kocharians....starting on page 60...
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > -----Original Message-----
>> > > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
>> > Of
>> > > Gary
>> > > Duncanson
>> > > Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2007 10:46 AM
>> > > To: Narbik Kocharians
>> > > Cc: swm@emanon.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
>> > > Subject: Re: PPPoFR
>> > >
>> > > Hi Narbik,
>> > >
>> > > Now that's interesting, how will that work for PPPoFR? How does that
>> > > satisfy
>> > > the need to ping your own IP address in terms of the IP address
>> > assigned
>> > > to
>> > > your physical or subinterface used for a FR PVC?
>> > >
>> > > Regards
>> > > Gary
>> > > ----- Original Message -----
>> > > From: Narbik Kocharians
>> > > To: Gary Duncanson
>> > > Cc: Phillip Day ; ccielab@groupstudy.com
>> > > Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2007 6:11 PM
>> > > Subject: Re: PPPoFR
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Use the "ip unnumbered lo0" to assign an IP address, that way you
>> > should
>> > > be
>> > > able to ping your own IP address.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On 7/4/07, Gary Duncanson <gary.duncanson@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> > > Had this one myself recently.
>> > >
>> > > This insight came from Scott Morris..
>> > >
>> > > 'If you are doing PPPoFR, you will never be able to ping your own
>> > IP
>> > > address.
>> > >
>> > > (Unless you use unnumbered from another interface, but technically
>> > then
>> > > you
>> > > are pinging that one!)'
>> > >
>> > > ----- Original Message -----
>> > > From: "Phillip Day" < Phillip.Day@telindus.co.uk>
>> > > To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>> > > Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2007 11:13 AM
>> > > Subject: PPPoFR
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > > Does anyone know of an obvious way I'm missing to ping your
>> > > local
>> >
>> > > > interface on a PPPoFR link? And in a lab is it likely you would
>> > need
>> > > to
>> > > > be able to?
>> > > >
>> > > > Thanks in advance
>> > > >
>> > > > Phill Day
>> > > >
>> > > > This e-mail is private and may be confidential and is for the
>> > > intended
>> > > > recipient only. If misdirected, please notify us by telephone
>> > and
>> > > confirm
>> > > > that it has been deleted from your system and any copies
>> > destroyed.
>> > > If
>> > > > you
>> > > > are not the intended recipient you are strictly prohibited from
>> > > using,
>> > > > printing, copying, distributing or disseminating this e-mail or
>> > any
>> > > > information contained in it. We use reasonable endeavours to
>> > virus
>> > > scan
>> > > > all
>> > > > e-mails leaving the Company but no warranty is given that this
>> > e-mail
>> > > and
>> > > > any
>> > > > attachments are virus free. You should undertake your own virus
>> > > checking.
>> > > > The right to monitor e-mail communications through our network
>> > > is
>> > > reserved
>> > > > by
>> > > > us.
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > _______________________________________________________________________
>> > > > Subscription information may be found at:
>> > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>> > >
>> > >
> _______________________________________________________________________
>> >
>> > > Subscription information may be found at:
>> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Narbik Kocharians
>> > > CCIE# 12410 (R&S, SP, Security)
>> > > CCSI# 30832
>> > >
>> > >
>> > _______________________________________________________________________
>> > > Subscription information may be found at:
>> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>> Narbik Kocharians
>> CCIE# 12410 (R&S, SP, Security)
>> CCSI# 30832
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Narbik Kocharians
> CCIE# 12410 (R&S, SP, Security)
> CCSI# 30832
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Aug 18 2007 - 08:17:39 ART