From: JOEL AMAO (femmy79@hotmail.com)
Date: Tue Jul 03 2007 - 16:19:34 ART
RTO OF 5000 is not a problem. RTO of 5000 with a Q count > 1 is a problem.
In general, i have noticed that EIGRP's RTO defaults to 5000 when adjacency is
formed via a logical interface such as Tunnel interface.
Thanks
Joel
CCIE#18128
> To: ccie2k4@gmail.com> CC: ccielab@groupstudy.com> Subject: Re: EIGRP - RTO
value - 3d Try> Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 19:12:27 +0100> From:
gary.duncanson@googlemail.com> > RTO (Retransmit timeout) for your updates
queries and replies is typically 6 > x Smooth Round Trip Time.> Minimum RTO is
200ms> Maximum RTO is 5000 ms (5 second)> > RTO 5000 can be indicative of a
unidirectional link problem.>
http://www.ciscopress.com/articles/article.asp?p=27839&rl=1> > HTH> Gary>
----- Original Message ----- > From: <ccie2k4@gmail.com>> To: "Cisco
certification" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>> Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2007 1:18 PM>
Subject: Fwd: EIGRP - RTO value - 3d Try> > > > Hi, my 3d try. pls help. thx>
>> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------> > From: ccie2k4@gmail.com
<ccie2k4@gmail.com>> > Date: Jun 30, 2007 9:37 PM> > Subject: EIGRP - RTO
value> > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com> >> > Hi, can anyone please confirm if it
is normal to have a RTO value of 5000 > > in> > the output of a show ip eigrp
neighbors. I seem to be seeing this in a lot> > of devices. The RTO counter as
defined means that "the amount of time that> > EIGRP will wait to retransmit a
reliable packet from the retransmission> > queue." I have read examples and
seen a couple of posts that lean towards> > saying that this isn't good
however I am not so certain if this is true or> > not. There seem to be no
problems on the links (not dropping any pings) > > and> > the drop counters
are not incrementing. The Q cnt is 0 which I am sure is> > good. Could someone
please confirm the RTO counter. Thx> >> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Aug 18 2007 - 08:17:39 ART