From: Gregory Gombas (ggombas@gmail.com)
Date: Mon Jul 02 2007 - 10:54:49 ART
Joe it looks like your parent policy is giving strict priority to
voice and the child policy is subdividing the voice traffic among
three users - is that correct?
Or is your intent to prioritize voice traffic and split the remaining
bandwidth (class-default) amongst the three users?
Thanks
On 7/2/07, Joe Higgins <ninajoe123@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have the following scenerio that I need some help . I have a link on a
> serial interface that passes voice and data traffic to three clients. My qos
> requirement is to give strict priority to all voice traffic regardless to
> which client it is destined. I then have to give each client one third of
> any bandwidth that is still available. The following is my proposed
> configuration.
>
>
> class-map match-all rtptraffic
>
> match protocol rtp voice
>
>
>
> class-map match-all client1
>
> match access-group 101
>
>
>
> class-map match-all client2
>
> match access-group 102
>
>
>
> class-map match-all client3
>
> match access-group 103
>
>
>
> policy-map othertraffic
>
> class client1
>
> bandwidth percent 33
>
> class client2
>
> bandwidth percent 33
>
> class client3
>
> bandwidth percent 33
>
>
>
> policy-map voice
>
> class rtptraffic
>
> priority percent 100
>
> service-policy othertraffic
>
>
>
> interface serial 1/0
>
> max-reserved-bandwidth 90
>
> service-policy output voice
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Aug 18 2007 - 08:17:39 ART