From: darth router (darklordrouter@gmail.com)
Date: Sat Jun 30 2007 - 05:31:47 ART
Awesome, thanks guys,
DR
On 6/30/07, anthony.sequeira@thomson.com <anthony.sequeira@thomson.com>
wrote:
>
> Yeah - exactly. As I am sure the Brians would tell you - they do not
> want you to try and learn QoS using the labs. They will teach you QoS in
> their classes, then you go to the labs when you completely understand
> the technologies.
>
> Try and be patient - QoS is a massive and complex topic. Take it one
> piece at a time (for example, classification and marking) and try and
> avoid a "quick fix" approach.
>
> If you are interested in my Expanded Blueprint for topics that I studied
> I have copied it below. I did this with some hesitation because I
> certainly do not want to overwhelm you.
>
> Again - take it slow and as you study - pelt this list with questions.
>
> VI. QoS
> A. Quality of service solutions
> B. Classification and Marking
> I. Using MQC
> I. Using NBAR
> II. Using PBR
> III. Using CAR
> IV. QoS Policy Propagation via BGP
> V. DE
> I. DE List
> II. MQC
> VI. 3550 - Classifying Traffic on a Per-Port Per-VLAN Basis by Using
> Class Maps
> C. Congestion management, congestion avoidance
> I. Legacy Congestion Management (WFQ, CQ, PQ)
> II. LLQ
> III. CBWFQ
> IV. WRED
> V. 3550 - Expedite Queue
> D. Policing and shaping
> I. 3550 Policing
> II. Policing with MQC
> I. Two-Rate Policer
> II. Percentage-based Policing and Shaping
> III. Unconditional Packet Discard
> IV. Control Plane Policing
> V. Shaping with MQC
> VI. CAR
> VII. Generic Traffic Shaping
> VIII. FRTS
> E. Signaling
> I. RSVP
> F. Link efficiency mechanisms
> I. MultiLink PPP (MLP)
> I. MPL Interleaving and Queuing
> II. Multiclass Multilink PPP
> II. FRF.12
> III. FTF.16
> IV. Compressed Real-Time Protocol
> V. Compression - STAC versus PREDICTOR
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Gary Duncanson
> Sent: Friday, June 29, 2007 3:13 PM
> To: darth router
> Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: QOS in IE labs enough to pass QOS on the lab?
>
> Have you looked at the Cisco Press books on QoS and the written official
>
> exam certifification guide by Wendall Odom?
>
> These should help your theory and provide more examples to lab up.
>
> Regards
> Gary
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "darth router" <darklordrouter@gmail.com>
> To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Friday, June 29, 2007 5:24 PM
>
> Subject: QOS in IE labs enough to pass QOS on the lab?
>
>
> > There seems to much less switch QOS in the IE, labs that I have done
> so
> > far
> > compared to the NMC labs. There is tons and tons of frame relay type
> > shaping
> > scenarios in IE, which is good, because I am learning it. I have been
> > trying
> > to read up and learn everything I can. I am just wondering if it is
> > enough.
> > I have gotten through around 10 of the IE labs. QOS in general is just
> > kicking my ass., mostly on question interpretation. I have done the
> first
> > two mock labs and graded them myself, and got around 90%, though I do
> not
> > really feel that I know enough for the real lab. Any thoughts, tips,
> > strategies on tackling enough QOS?
> >
> > DR
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Jul 01 2007 - 17:24:53 ART