From: louis john (west_coast@inbox.com)
Date: Sat Jun 30 2007 - 03:40:18 ART
I believe there should be a way, now I am looking for the most effecient one though it can be not efficient by itself.
the following can be supported by the 3750 :
SW1(config)#port-channel load-balance ?
dst-ip Dst IP Addr
dst-mac Dst Mac Addr
src-dst-ip Src XOR Dst IP Addr
src-dst-mac Src XOR Dst Mac Addr
src-ip Src IP Addr
src-mac Src Mac Addr
SW3(config)#port-channel load-balance ?
dst-mac Dst Mac Addr
src-mac Src Mac Addr
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mikraus@cisco.com
> Sent: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 01:30:11 -0400
> To: west_coast@inbox.com, ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: The most efficient Etherchannel load balancing
>
> As I'm reading this, I'd say this is a trick question. Packets between
> two IP hosts always use the same port for packet transmission. So, it
> wouldn't really matter which method is chosen.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> louis john
> Sent: Saturday, June 30, 2007 12:04 AM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: The most efficient Etherchannel load balancing
>
> Folks,
>
>
> I have the following two scenarios and I want to know the most efficient
> load balancing method:
>
>
>
>
> HOST A--------3570-0/13----------------0/13--3550--------HOST B
> -0/14----------------0/14-
>
>
>
>
>
> HOST A--------3570--0/13----------------0/13-3570--------HOST B
> -0/14----------------0/14-
>
>
>
> As you can guess, HOST A and HOST B are fixed, there will be no more
> than one host on each side, now both of the hosts are one the same vlan.
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Jul 01 2007 - 17:24:53 ART