From: Brian Dennis (bdennis@internetworkexpert.com)
Date: Fri Jun 29 2007 - 03:37:52 ART
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/cat3560/12225see/scg/
System MTU
The default system MTU for traffic on the switch is 1500 bytes. You can
configure Fast Ethernet ports to support frames larger than 1500 bytes by
using the system mtu global configuration command. You can configure Gigabit
Ethernet ports to support frames larger than 1500 bytes by using the system
mtu jumbo global configuration command. Because the IEEE 802.1Q tunneling
feature increases the frame size by 4 bytes when the metro tag is added, you
must configure all switches in the service-provider network to be able to
process maximum frames by increasing the switch system MTU size to at least
1504 bytes. The maximum allowable system MTU for Gigabit Ethernet interfaces
is 9000 bytes; the maximum system MTU for Fast Ethernet interfaces is 1546
bytes.
--Brian Dennis, CCIE4 #2210 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/SP) bdennis@internetworkexpert.com Internetwork Expert, Inc. http://www.InternetworkExpert.com Toll Free: 877-224-8987 Direct: 775-745-6404 (Outside the US and Canada)
On 6/28/07 10:51 PM, "Chris Proctor" <cproctor@sungardcollegis.com> wrote:
> Does anyone know where the 1504 byte is coming from? That doesn't even > ring a bell as a standard MTU + encapsulation match (IP + MPLS shim > maybe?) Is it just a code bug or what? > > -----Original Message----- > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of > John Gibson > Sent: Sunday, June 24, 2007 2:46 PM > To: Mark Mckillop (mmckillo); Antonio Soares; Radioactive Frog > Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com > Subject: RE: RE: MTU Mismatch in OSPF > > I am thinking that if the switches have mtu 1504 > and routers have 1500, when the switches tries > to initiate TCP connections (e.g. ftp download > some image files) to the routers, the packet will > , by default without extra protection mechanism, > be dropped at some router. > > But TCP has a MSS that is around 1460 (with my > linux box, and I hope this is the same in the catalyst > switches) , which limits the IP packet size to > 1500 when the OS tries to make packets. So FTP > download will be fine. > > But I am thinking that TFTP download will fail. > UDP does not have MSS. > > John > > --- "Mark Mckillop (mmckillo)" <mmckillo@cisco.com> > wrote: > >> A nice option also is to do: >> >> system mtu routing 1500 >> >> This will avoid you needing to use the mtu-ignore >> command, although it >> only works on the 3560's. It doesn't require a >> reboot either. Just >> ignoring something always feels like a bad thing >> thing to do :) >> >> Mark. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: nobody@groupstudy.com >> [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of >> Antonio Soares >> Sent: 23 June 2007 17:58 >> To: 'Radioactive Frog'; johngibson1541@yahoo.com >> Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com >> Subject: RE: RE: MTU Mismatch in OSPF >> >> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> The 3560 default is 1500: >> >> Switch#sh flash >> >> Directory of flash:/ >> >> 2 -rwx 7963038 Mar 1 1993 00:57:27 +00:00 >> c3560-advipservicesk9-mz.122-25.SEE2.bin >> >> 32514048 bytes total (24549888 bytes free) Switch# >> Switch# Switch#sh >> flash >> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> Directory of flash:/ >> >> 2 -rwx 7963038 Mar 1 1993 00:57:27 +00:00 >> c3560-advipservicesk9-mz.122-25.SEE2.bin >> >> 32514048 bytes total (24549888 bytes free) >> >> Switch#sh system mtu >> >> System MTU size is 1500 bytes >> System Jumbo MTU size is 1500 bytes >> Routing MTU size is 1500 bytes >> Switch# >> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> >> But the way, when you have an OSPF Mtu Mismatch, >> where you do add the >> "ip ospf mtu-ignore" command ? >> >> 1) The device with the lower Mtu. >> 2) The device with the higher Mtu. >> 3) Both devices. >> >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: nobody@groupstudy.com >> [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of >> Radioactive Frog >> Sent: sabado, 23 de Junho de 2007 5:23 >> To: johngibson1541@yahoo.com >> Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com >> Subject: Re: RE: MTU Mismatch in OSPF >> >> dats sound strange to me! >> frog >> >> >> On 6/23/07, johngibson1541@yahoo.com >> <johngibson1541@yahoo.com> wrote: >>> >>> I think 3550's MTU at 1504 is caused by a file >> flash:env_vars >>> >>> If I remove this file, then reload it will become >> 1500. >>> >>> My 3560 is a different story. It is 1504 by >> itself. >>> >>> Strangely, univercd keeps talking about 3560 and >> 3550 default mtu >>> being 1500. They are just not saying the correct >> thing. >>> >>> 3560 at 12.2(25) , 12.2(35) , and the latest >> 12.2(37) all make the >>> same mistake! >>> >>> >> > ______________________________________________________________________ >>> _ Subscription information may be found at: >>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html >> >> > _______________________________________________________________________ >> Subscription information may be found at: >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html >> >> > _______________________________________________________________________ >> Subscription information may be found at: >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html >> > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________ > ____________ > Shape Yahoo! in your own image. Join our Network Research Panel today! > http://surveylink.yahoo.com/gmrs/yahoo_panel_invite.asp?a=7 > > _______________________________________________________________________ > Subscription information may be found at: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html > > _______________________________________________________________________ > Subscription information may be found at: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Jul 01 2007 - 17:24:52 ART