From: ismail el-shalh (ishelh_mdsa@yahoo.com)
Date: Wed Jun 27 2007 - 00:31:32 ART
The backup feature is inhereted in both Autorp and BSR
Ismail El-Shalh :)
Senior Network Engineer
Computer & Communication
MMR/MDSA
Mobile : +966-505-893-568
ishelh@mdsa.com
----- Original Message ----
From: Antonio Soares <amsoares@netcabo.pt>
To: johngibson1541@yahoo.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2007 3:28:03 AM
Subject: RE: if we just want to have a backup RP, is MSDP needed ?
I read this:
"Because some sources might choose one physical RP and some receivers a
different physical RP, the rendezvous process for PIM-SM cannot operate as
designed".
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
johngibson1541@yahoo.com
Sent: terga-feira, 26 de Junho de 2007 21:46
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: if we just want to have a backup RP, is MSDP needed ?
I know MSDP application AncastRP can be used to backup RP.
I have experimented using 2 loopback interfaces in 2 routers to backup each
other as the RP address using 1 single IP address.
I don't use any MSDP , I have no problem switching over from
1 RP to another.
I know univrecd says the AncastRP application has no effect on those
receiver-source pairs that are actively receiving/sending data because they
are using shortest trees and RP is irrelevant.
So, in my experiment, I stop the receiver as primary RP fails in purpose
just to see receiving leaf router triggering (*,G) toward RP from scratch.
It works fine.
univercd says MSDP is good for monitoring continuously active source.
My source is actively sending data throughout entire experiment too.
I don't understand why we need MSDP for this purpose.
I know there must be some subtle difference MSDP brings I just don't
understand.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Jul 01 2007 - 17:24:52 ART