From: Alan Ewer (acewer64@gmail.com)
Date: Mon Jun 25 2007 - 04:20:48 ART
Hi ..
My understanding (as feeble as it is ) is as follows:
If the fport is considered as such:
int fas 0/10
switch access vlan 10
switch voice vlan dot1p
Then the voice traffic will come end up on vlan 1 (default native vlan for
trunk) and untagged data from pc will end up as vlan 10
if the config is as follows:
int fas 0/10
switch access vlan 10
switch voice vlan dot1p
switch trunk native vlan 200
then the untagged data will end up as vlan 10 and the voice as 200 (because
it is the native vlan)
Is this correct ?
Regds
Alan E
On 6/25/07, M S <michaelgstout@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> I was looking at this today. Can you let me know if i have it backwards?
> The 802.1p tag contains vlan 0, which is the native vlan. but when you
> connect the cisco phone to the cisco switch a trunk is automatically formed.
> With switchport interface command switchport access vlan 5, wouldn't the
> data traffic be tagged with vlan 5 and the 802.1p traffic be placed into
> the native vlan (vlan0)?
>
> THank You.
>
> ------------------------------
> From: *"Scott Morris" <smorris@ipexpert.com>*
> Reply-To: *"Scott Morris" <smorris@ipexpert.com>*
> To: *"'Alan Ewer'" <acewer64@gmail.com>, "'Cisco certification'" <
> ccielab@groupstudy.com>*
> Subject: *RE: Voice Vlan 0 - DOT1P*
> Date: *Sun, 24 Jun 2007 21:59:21 -0400*
> If you search Cisco's website (or Google) you'll find lots of references
> for
> VLAN 0 in regards to Voice VLANs. Basically, this is a designation for
> untagged frames, which means whatever your trunk's native VLAN is set to
> in
> the dot1q trunk to an IP phone, that's what VLAN 0 represents.
>
> That'll also mean it's the same VLAN as your PC's data behind the phone,
> and
> I'll tell you that's generally not a good idea in deployments. But this
> is
> all about the lab. :)
>
> So how about changing your voice vlan to something other than the default
> command set!
>
> To an IP phone, you SHOULD be trunking. The general spec is voice is
> tagged
> (dot1q), PC data is untagged (access vlan AKA your trunk's native vlan,
> untagged).
>
> HTH,
>
>
> Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, JNCIE
> #153, CISSP, et al.
> CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-J
> VP - Technical Training - IPexpert, Inc.
> IPexpert Sr. Technical Instructor
>
> A Cisco Learning Partner - We Accept Learning Credits!
>
> smorris@ipexpert.com
>
> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
> Fax: +1.810.454.0130
> http://www.ipexpert.com
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Alan
> Ewer
> Sent: Sunday, June 24, 2007 8:36 PM
> To: Cisco certification
> Subject: Voice Vlan 0 - DOT1P
>
> Hi all...
> sorry if this has been answered before.....
>
> I am playing around with voice vlans on 3550's
>
> When I invoke the "switch voice vlan dot1p" command I get a message
> referring to the voice VLAN being VLAN0, yet i cannot create/see VLAN 0
>
> So where is this mystical VLAN ? How do I use it and why is the voice
> traffic there ?? I would have thought that i would put it on the default
> native vlan for the interface (usually vlan 1) .....as usual the Cisco
> doco
> is unhelpful..and to some extent confusing (to me at least)...
>
> Also if voice vlan is 0 and access vlan is 1, doesnt this imply that the
> port is also trunking ??
>
>
> any explanation gratefully accepted..
>
> Regds
> AlanE
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> ------------------------------
> Make every IM count. Download Messenger and join the i'm Initiative now.
> It's free. <http://g.msn.com/8HMBENUS/2752??PS=47575>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Jul 01 2007 - 17:24:51 ART