RE: RE: MTU Mismatch in OSPF

From: Antonio Soares (amsoares@netcabo.pt)
Date: Sat Jun 23 2007 - 13:58:17 ART


+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
The 3560 default is 1500:

Switch#sh flash

Directory of flash:/

    2 -rwx 7963038 Mar 1 1993 00:57:27 +00:00
c3560-advipservicesk9-mz.122-25.SEE2.bin

32514048 bytes total (24549888 bytes free)
Switch#
Switch#
Switch#sh flash
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Directory of flash:/

    2 -rwx 7963038 Mar 1 1993 00:57:27 +00:00
c3560-advipservicesk9-mz.122-25.SEE2.bin

32514048 bytes total (24549888 bytes free)

Switch#sh system mtu

System MTU size is 1500 bytes
System Jumbo MTU size is 1500 bytes
Routing MTU size is 1500 bytes
Switch#
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

But the way, when you have an OSPF Mtu Mismatch, where you do add the "ip
ospf mtu-ignore" command ?

1) The device with the lower Mtu.
2) The device with the higher Mtu.
3) Both devices.

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Radioactive Frog
Sent: sabado, 23 de Junho de 2007 5:23
To: johngibson1541@yahoo.com
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: RE: MTU Mismatch in OSPF

dats sound strange to me!
frog

On 6/23/07, johngibson1541@yahoo.com <johngibson1541@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> I think 3550's MTU at 1504 is caused by a file flash:env_vars
>
> If I remove this file, then reload it will become 1500.
>
> My 3560 is a different story. It is 1504 by itself.
>
> Strangely, univercd keeps talking about 3560 and 3550 default mtu
> being 1500. They are just not saying the correct thing.
>
> 3560 at 12.2(25) , 12.2(35) , and the latest 12.2(37) all make the
> same mistake!
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> _ Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Jul 01 2007 - 17:24:51 ART