From: Du, Jianbo (jdu@ebay.com)
Date: Thu Jun 21 2007 - 02:41:37 ART
Had you tried "no ip pim dm-fallback"?
Regards,
Jerry
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Narbik Kocharians
Sent: Friday, June 15, 2007 10:58 PM
To: Kyle MacDonald
Cc: Gregory Gombas; Group study
Subject: Re: Do not let any of your groups run in dense mode?
May be BSR
On 6/15/07, Kyle MacDonald <Kyle.MacDonald@pwgsc.gc.ca> wrote:
>
> I don't think you're splitting hairs. I would interpret no dense mode
> to mean that you cannot use Auto RP.
>
> Kyle
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
> Of Gregory Gombas
> Sent: Friday, June 15, 2007 10:12 AM
> To: Group study
> Subject: Do not let any of your groups run in dense mode?
>
> If a task says that you must not use dense mode for any of your
> groups, does that mean you cannot use Auto RP?
>
> It is my understanding that even if you use pim sparse-mode with the
> auto-rp listener command you are still using dense mode for groups
> 224.0.0.39 and 224.0.0.40, therefore you are technically still using
> dense mode.
>
> Would that violate the task requirement, or am I just splitting hairs
> here?
>
> Thanks,
> Greg
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> _ Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> _ Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
-- Narbik Kocharians CCIE# 12410 (R&S, SP, Security) CCSI# 30832
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Jul 01 2007 - 17:24:50 ART