Re: RE : Attack by Proctor

From: Hoogen (hoogen82@gmail.com)
Date: Tue Jun 19 2007 - 10:59:30 ART


Hmm.. i did mention a few posts before that there were things injected into
my lab, more on troubleshooting aspect. But i did think that was completely
okay. I did explain it to the proctor about the bad routes getting injected.
But I did the troubleshooting and showed the solution and proctor told me
"Its okay now, but do remove the command off " that I inserted to ward of
the bad routes. So as Scott says troubleshooting aspect was very much
applicable to me. This was almost two years back though.

I guess it all depends if the proctor wants to test you. I look like a kid
so probably the proctor thought this kid should be tested before he get his
CCIE.

-Hoogen

On 6/19/07, Alexei Monastyrnyi <alexeim@orcsoftware.com> wrote:
>
> And this list can go on and on.
>
> A friend of mine in Brussels back in year 2002 struggled about an hour
> trying to bring up an ATM PVC with number based on his POD number (being
> 11 in dec -> B in hex).
>
> I failed my 3rd attempt because of using IPv6 prefix FCE instead of FEC.
>
> MIND THE GAP! :-)
>
> A.
>
>
> on 6/18/2007 11:36 AM Ovidiu Neghina wrote:
> > yeap
> > Stress can do strange things to the mind . Several times it happened to
> me
> > when doing labs that i configured the wrong AS number for eigrp , or
> several
> > AS-es, wrong area number for ospf ...etc
> > I try to do this configure, verify , troubleshoot. Verify is a must to
> get
> > this silly mistakes.
> >
> > Ovidiu
> >
> >
> > On 6/18/07, Marko Milivojevic <markom@vodafone.is> wrote:
> >> I had very similar experience in one of my Dynamips labs yesterday. I
> >> could swear that I configured the correct router, but alas, it was
> paste in
> >> the wrong window.
> >>
> >> Beware of silly mistakes when under pressure.
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> >> wjoh71@gmail.com
> >> Sent: 18. jznm 2007 07:55
> >> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> >> Subject: Re: RE: RE : Attack by Proctor
> >>
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I also had the same problem. 30 minutes before the end of exam in
> >> BRUSSELS, I noticed a couple of changes in the routers and
> switches. For
> >> example,
> >>
> >> 1. network statement (ip address ) under ospf got changed.
> >> 2. area 1 nssa kept in the other router though i configured in the
> right
> >> router.
> >> 3. additional eigrp process was running in the router.
> >>
> >> I am not sure whether these are part of exam troubleshooting or these
> are
> >> introduced by the proctors intentionally to make the candidates to
> >> fail. Could any one comment on this?.
> >>
> >> thanks,
> >> Joh
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________________________________
> >> Subscription information may be found at:
> >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________________________________
> >> Subscription information may be found at:
> >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Jul 01 2007 - 17:24:50 ART