From: Sadiq Yakasai (sadiqtanko@gmail.com)
Date: Mon Jun 18 2007 - 19:10:13 ART
Guys,
1) I tried it both ways and it worked. I dont think it matters, so far
you configure it in the right way.
2) I am not sure why you would want to configure an etherchannel
between two switches and make it an access port? Not a routed port?
Please would there be any situation when you would configure a link
between 2 switches and not make it either a trunk or a routed link?
Thanks
On 6/18/07, Edison Ortiz <edisonmortiz@gmail.com> wrote:
> 1) trunk first, etherchannel second.
>
> 2) Yes.
> __
>
> Edison Ortiz
> (Routing & Switching, CCIE # 17943)
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "joh willi" <wjoh71@gmail.com>
> To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 4:45 PM
> Subject: Switching
>
>
> > SW1 3550 ---------- SW2 3560
> >
> > Could you answer to the following considering SW1 is connected to SW2?.
> >
> > 1. If I configure the L2 etherchannel between them, should I worry about
> > trunk?. If yes, then in which order (trunk first, etherchannel second)
> > the
> > config needs to be done?
> > 2. If I configure the L2 etherchannel between them, can I assign them as
> > access port?.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Joh
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Jul 01 2007 - 17:24:49 ART