Avoiding (S,G) Entries

From: Antonio Soares (amsoares@netcabo.pt)
Date: Thu Jun 14 2007 - 21:23:30 ART

• Next message: Scott Morris: "RE: training material question"
• Previous message: jslauer@hotmail.com: "Re: training material question"
• Next in thread: Antonio Soares: "RE: Avoiding (S,G) Entries"
• Maybe reply: Antonio Soares: "RE: Avoiding (S,G) Entries"
• Maybe reply: Kyle MacDonald: "RE: Avoiding (S,G) Entries"
• Maybe reply: Kyle MacDonald: "RE: Avoiding (S,G) Entries"
• Maybe reply: Antonio Soares: "RE: Avoiding (S,G) Entries"
• Maybe reply: Blaine Williams: "Re: Avoiding (S,G) Entries"
• Maybe reply: Brian McGahan: "RE: Avoiding (S,G) Entries"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hello group,

I have some problems with the task wording when it calls to avoid (S,G)
entries in the Mcast Routing Table.

I see 3 options and i would like to have your inputs regarding the different
behaviours we get with each command:

- ip pim bidir-enable and ip pim rp-address x.x.x.x bidir

- no ip pim dm-fallback

- ip pim spt-threshold infinity

Thanks,
Antonio

• Next message: Scott Morris: "RE: training material question"
• Previous message: jslauer@hotmail.com: "Re: training material question"
• Next in thread: Antonio Soares: "RE: Avoiding (S,G) Entries"
• Maybe reply: Antonio Soares: "RE: Avoiding (S,G) Entries"
• Maybe reply: Kyle MacDonald: "RE: Avoiding (S,G) Entries"
• Maybe reply: Kyle MacDonald: "RE: Avoiding (S,G) Entries"
• Maybe reply: Antonio Soares: "RE: Avoiding (S,G) Entries"
• Maybe reply: Blaine Williams: "Re: Avoiding (S,G) Entries"
• Maybe reply: Brian McGahan: "RE: Avoiding (S,G) Entries"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Jul 01 2007 - 17:24:49 ART