From: Ronnie Angello (ronnie.angello@gmail.com)
Date: Tue Jun 05 2007 - 13:49:20 ART
With IPv6 you either have to manually redistribute connected interfaces or
use the include-connected option when redistributing your routing protocol.
On 6/5/07, German Antonio Gonzalez -X (gergonza - TMP at Cisco) <
gergonza@cisco.com> wrote:
>
> Hi, does this also apply to IPv6 routing protocols? I remember having
> ran into a problem a while ago because as I remember it was not
> redistributing connected interfaces running the protocol
> automatically... I might be wrong... ;)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Bhaskar Sivanesan
> Sent: Monday, June 04, 2007 1:39 AM
> To: Blaine Williams
> Cc: ccie forum
> Subject: Re: reg. Redistribution
>
> Thanks all for the clarification....
>
> cheers
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Blaine Williams <williams.blaine@gmail.com>
> To: Bhaskar Sivanesan <bas_bharath@yahoo.com>
> Cc: ccie forum <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Monday, June 4, 2007 3:19:25 AM
> Subject: Re: reg. Redistribution
>
>
> Bear in mind that there is no double redistribution on the same router.
> For example, let say you have OSPF and RIP running on a router. OSPF is
> running on E0/1. RIP is running on E0/0. As part of your OSPF
> configuration, you are redistributing connected into OSPF.
> However, you are using a route-map to only redistribute your loopback
> into OSPF. Here's the diagram:
>
> (OSPF) E0/1----- R1 -----E0/0 (RIP)
> |
> Lo0
>
> Now, when you redistribute RIP into OSPF, E0/0's network will not show
> up in your OSPF domain. OSPF will pick up all of the routes from sh ip
> route rip (step one from Brian's explanation). Then, it skips the
> second step of bringing in the connected interfaces that RIP is enabled
> on, because you are already redistributing connected.
> Connected interfaces are only brought into a protocol once.
>
> On 6/3/07, Bhaskar Sivanesan <bas_bharath@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > HI
> >
> > When redistributing between any routing protocols(say OSPF and RIP
> here), I understand only OSPF routes present in the routing table gets
> redistributed into RIP and similarly only RIP routes present in the
> routing table will be redistributed into OSPF.
> >
> > Is this right??
> >
> > If it is, will the directly connected networks also be re-distributed
> automatically. I mean, suppose we have enabled OSPF on interface E0/0
> with IP 1.1.1.1, then 1.1.1.0 will appear as directly connected in the
> ROUTING table. When we redistribute OSPF into another routing protocol,
> does it include 1.1.1.0 also in the redistribution?
> >
> > thanks
> > Bhaskar
> >
> >
> >
> > ______________________________________________________________________
> > ______________ Yahoo! oneSearch: Finally, mobile search that gives
> > answers, not web links.
> > http://mobile.yahoo.com/mobileweb/onesearch?refer=1ONXIC
> >
> > ______________________________________________________________________
> > _ Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> ____________
> Choose the right car based on your needs. Check out Yahoo! Autos new
> Car Finder tool.
> http://autos.yahoo.com/carfinder/
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
-- Ronald Angello CCIE #17846
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Jul 01 2007 - 17:24:46 ART