From: Ronnie Angello (ronnie.angello@gmail.com)
Date: Sun Jun 03 2007 - 19:24:44 ART
I think Brian Dennis had a good explanation...
"Basic route redistribution on a single router is a two step process. The
first step is to bring in the routes from the routing table for the protocol
being redistributed (show ip route <protocol>). The second step is to bring
in the connected interfaces that the protocol is enabled on (i.e. network
statements)."
On 6/3/07, Bhaskar Sivanesan <bas_bharath@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> HI
>
> When redistributing between any routing protocols(say OSPF and RIP here),
> I understand only OSPF routes present in the routing table gets
> redistributed into RIP and similarly only RIP routes present in the routing
> table will be redistributed into OSPF.
>
> Is this right??
>
> If it is, will the directly connected networks also be re-distributed
> automatically. I mean, suppose we have enabled OSPF on interface E0/0 with
> IP 1.1.1.1, then 1.1.1.0 will appear as directly connected in the ROUTING
> table. When we redistribute OSPF into another routing protocol, does it
> include 1.1.1.0 also in the redistribution?
>
> thanks
> Bhaskar
>
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________________________________
> Yahoo! oneSearch: Finally, mobile search
> that gives answers, not web links.
> http://mobile.yahoo.com/mobileweb/onesearch?refer=1ONXIC
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
-- Ronald Angello CCIE #17846
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Jul 01 2007 - 17:24:46 ART