From: Guyler, Rik (rguyler@shp-dayton.org)
Date: Fri Jun 01 2007 - 14:03:02 ART
This is currently only planned for wireless but who knows. That could
change at any time. We are installing LWAP in our two new campuses but the
existing campuses are all APs with WLSE/WLSM so I'm leaning towards
GRE/VRF-lite to keep it consistent.
Thanks,
Rik
PS: I'll look for you at Networkers. The one with a Cisco bag...right?
Can't be too hard to find. ;-)
-----Original Message-----
From: Ken Diliberto [mailto:ken@kdmd.net]
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2007 11:34 AM
To: Guyler, Rik; Cisco certification; cisco@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: OT - Campus Path Isolation - MPLS, VRF-lite, etc.
Wireless, wired or both? If it's only wireless and you're using a WLC
solution, your problem is solved for you with LWAPP tunnels back to the
controller.
Ken
Guyler, Rik wrote:
> Well, I was considering GRE with VRF-lite to avoid running PBR. I
> like the simplicity of GRE but needed some way to push down a second
> default route just for the guest SSID/VLAN and couldn't think of
> another way to do that without using some form of VRF.
>
> If you say p2mp GRE is an option as well I'll look into it. But is
> there some provision to keep our default routes isolated from one
> another? That was really my big need for the path isolation requirement.
>
> Rik
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Jul 01 2007 - 17:24:46 ART