shape peak - correct or incorrect

From: sirisak@itmanagement.co.th
Date: Fri May 25 2007 - 08:10:37 ART


Dear all.
   Since I see the example in the Doc CD about "shape peak" command.
Refer to this link.
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios124/124cr/hqos_r/qos_s1h.htm#wp1085303

The router uses formula -> peak rate = CIR(1 + Be / Bc)
The following example uses peak rate shaping to ensure a bandwidth of 300
kbps but allow throughput up to 512 kbps if enough bandwidth is available
on the interface:

bandwidth 300
shape peak 512000

so is this meant that "shape peak <value>", value = peak rate?, not CIR?

Best regards.
Sirisak



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jun 01 2007 - 06:55:22 ART