path mtu discovery is considered legacy?

From: johngibson1541@yahoo.com
Date: Wed May 23 2007 - 19:04:44 ART

• Next message: sam s: "Re: Ipsec L2L and NAT-T"
• Previous message: Tarun Pahuja: "Re: Ipsec L2L and NAT-T"
• Next in thread: spduo: "Re: path mtu discovery is considered legacy?"
• Maybe reply: spduo: "Re: path mtu discovery is considered legacy?"
• Maybe reply: John Gibson: "Re: path mtu discovery is considered legacy?"
• Maybe reply: Mohamed, Liban [NTK]: "RE: path mtu discovery is considered legacy?"
• Maybe reply: spduo: "Re: path mtu discovery is considered legacy?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

• Next message: sam s: "Re: Ipsec L2L and NAT-T"
• Previous message: Tarun Pahuja: "Re: Ipsec L2L and NAT-T"
• Next in thread: spduo: "Re: path mtu discovery is considered legacy?"
• Maybe reply: spduo: "Re: path mtu discovery is considered legacy?"
• Maybe reply: John Gibson: "Re: path mtu discovery is considered legacy?"
• Maybe reply: Mohamed, Liban [NTK]: "RE: path mtu discovery is considered legacy?"
• Maybe reply: spduo: "Re: path mtu discovery is considered legacy?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jun 01 2007 - 06:55:22 ART